> On May 15, 2016, at 11:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> On May 14, 2016, at 9:16 PM, bl...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>> Revision
>> 148683
>> Author
>> bl...@macports.org
>> Date
>> 2016-05-14 19:16:09 -0700 (Sat, 14 May 2016)
>> Log Message
>>
>> apache-ant: build +source variant build failu
Hi,
Did we ever agree on a consensus how to name ports that have Qt4 and Qt5
versions (instead of variants)?
I see a number that use a prefix (qt5-foo) and also some that use a suffix
(foo-qt5), at least among my (proposed) ports.
I wouldn't mind adhering to a scheme where the prefix indicates
Am 16.05.16 um 11:37 schrieb René J. V. Bertin:
Gustaf Neumann wrote:
Doesn't Tcl have the equivalent of sizeof(void*) or sizeof(size_t)?
see
puts $::tcl_platform(wordSize)
puts $::tcl_platform(pointerSize)
puts $::tcl_platform(machine)
Ah, interesting, thanks (I missed this on
Gustaf Neumann wrote:
>> Doesn't Tcl have the equivalent of sizeof(void*) or sizeof(size_t)?
> see
> puts $::tcl_platform(wordSize)
> puts $::tcl_platform(pointerSize)
> puts $::tcl_platform(machine)
Ah, interesting, thanks (I missed this one before).
Is there a theoretical differenc
