On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht
wrote:
> OpenSSL might be able to accomplish the same task and it is possible with
> OpenSSL to write a config file that fills in all the required fields. Port
> could write such a config per user.
OpenSSL can certainly create the signing cert
> On May 21, 2016, at 4:33 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> On 05/21/2016 04:33 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>> ...,
>> wouldn't it be possible to design an interface that allows users to specify
>> an identity in macports.conf, and ports to invoke codesign in the
>> post-activate stage?
>
> Yes, of
On 05/21/2016 04:33 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> ...,
> wouldn't it be possible to design an interface that allows users to specify
> an identity in macports.conf, and ports to invoke codesign in the
> post-activate stage?
Yes, of course. This would be the way to implement code-signing. When prev
On Saturday May 21 2016 12:54:00 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> That reference was old enough that it is probably something else now. I can
It would seem that /etc/authorization was deprecated in Feb. 2014 on my
machine, which IIRC corresponds to the epoch where I upgraded from 10.6 to 10.9
. The use
That reference was old enough that it is probably something else now. I can
dig deeper, I guess; I don't actually know much about the internals aside
from various failure cases I've run across while trying to decipher
weirdness on my machines. (and until recently I was on 10.9 so paid less
attentio
On Saturday May 21 2016 11:02:58 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> invalid. This can be as simple as /private/etc/authorization being corrupt
Should I have that file (on 10.9)? I only have
1660406 48 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 47369 Feb 14 2014
/etc/authorization.deprecated
1660407 24 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wh
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:33 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> May 21 16:20:08 Portia kernel[0]: CODE SIGNING:
> cs_invalid_page(0x105ead000): p=98132[kioslave] final status 0x0, allowing
> (remove VALID) page
So what I'm seeing is that this indicates that something is corrupted and
making the kernel thi
Hi,
I'm seeing messages like the one below, with a certain regularity:
May 21 16:20:08 Portia kernel[0]: CODE SIGNING: cs_invalid_page(0x105ead000):
p=98132[kioslave] final status 0x0, allowing (remove VALID) page
kioslave is a KDE4 or KF5 application, which can be used for lots of things
incl
