As long as we are on the topic of other package managers, about a year ago I
switched to conda (http://conda.pydata.org/docs/intro.html) on linux for
managing python and underlying c/fortran dependencies. I wondered if any
MacPorts developers had pursued conda on Mac with any success. There is
On 17 June 2016 at 18:32, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
>
>> Universal “snap” packages launch on multiple Linux distros
>>
>> https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/06/14/universal-snap-packages-launch-on-multiple-linux-distros/
>>
>> Even OpenWRT on the li
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <
kuznetsov.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I read emerying carefully. Very informative. But you missing a point. I'm
> not talking why it is not possible. Do you think all Linux distoros more
> compatible between each other than Mac with three build
>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
> Fink was written in 2000 shortly after the release of Mac OS X Public
> Beta. MacPorts was started in 2002. Why didn't its creators instead
> contribute to Fink? I don't know; I wasn't part of the project back then. A
> note on the Fink web s
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 3:49 PM, strom...@macports.org wrote:
>
> Revision
> 149404
> Author
> strom...@macports.org
> Date
> 2016-06-17 13:49:27 -0700 (Fri, 17 Jun 2016)
> Log Message
>
> zmq: update to version 4.1.5
> Modified Paths
>
> • trunk/dports/devel/zmq/Portfile
> homepage
On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Again: why? What problem are you trying to solve?
>
> I think snapd is a good point to try to start to be together. May be because
> no one tried three separate build system exists
Ed,
Could it make sense to divide up the project into a python part, and a
non-python part as two ports? Just a thought.
-Sterling
On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:44PM, Edward Maros wrote:
> I am working on a project that provides an interfaces to several
> scripting languages. One of these is Python
I am working on a project that provides an interfaces to several
scripting languages. One of these is Python. I have been working on
using PortGroup python 1.0 to provide all the correct values for the
python variant requested. The most notable is python.pkgd.
The unfortunate side effect of using
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov <
kuznetsov.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think snapd is a good point to try to start to be together. May be
> because no one tried three separate build system exists on Mac. Why waste
> people energy by supporting all of them instead of good collab
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
> Again: why? What problem are you trying to solve?
I think snapd is a good point to try to start to be together. May be
because no one tried three separate build system exists on Mac. Why waste
people energy by supporting all of them instead
On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> You're missing the point that those distributions are all based on Linux,
>> and Portfiles exist because OS X is not Linux and many packages need to be
>> beat over the head t
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Brandon Allbery
wrote:
>
> You're missing the point that those distributions are all based on Linux,
> and Portfiles exist because OS X is not Linux and many packages need to be
> beat over the head to build in the first place. Package formats are not the
> proble
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov <
kuznetsov.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is step in the right direction make all packages support for
> the same format. Having same portfile format (.yaml format) for all distros
> is very nice.
You're missing the point that those di
On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
>>
>> > Universal “snap” packages launch on multiple Linux distros
>> >
>> > https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/06/14/universal-sn
I think this is step in the right direction make all packages support for
the same format. Having same portfile format (.yaml format) for all distros
is very nice.
http://snapcraft.io/create/
-- AK
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Alexey Ku
On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Universal “snap” packages launch on multiple Linux distros
>
> https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/06/14/universal-snap-packages-launch-on-multiple-linux-distros/
>
> Even OpenWRT on the list. Why not join?
Do I understand correctly that you
Universal “snap” packages launch on multiple Linux distros
https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/06/14/universal-snap-packages-launch-on-multiple-linux-distros/
Even OpenWRT on the list. Why not join?
-- AK
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.m
17 matches
Mail list logo
