Hi all.
I have the following tickets ready for review:
New port: kotlin (2 weeks old)
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51576
jython: update to 2.7.0 (2 weeks old)
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51682
If someone could take a look that would be great.
Thanks,
Aaron
I've released version 7.4 of PortAuthority, my GUI for MacPorts. This
release has improved performance and some minor bug fixes. Binary
downloads for 10.11 here:
http://www.codebykevin.com/portauthority.html
A 30-day demo is available and a license purchase ensures free upgrades
for life.
On Monday July 04 2016 11:06:47 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>What IDEs are you thinking of?
Actually any IDE suitable for development of the FOSS packages which I think
make up the majority of ports. So almost any IDE except for Xcode ...
Personally I mostly use KDevelop (has good cmake support esp. if
On Jul 4, 2016, at 4:05 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Would it make sense to consider something like a `port ide
> [ide-options]` command which starts an IDE of choice with the environment set
> appropriately for MacPorts? Or are there too few port developers who would
> use such a feature
Hi,
Would it make sense to consider something like a `port ide
[ide-options]` command which starts an IDE of choice with the environment set
appropriately for MacPorts? Or are there too few port developers who would use
such a feature with an IDE where the environment has an actual influence
On 2016-07-02 08:51, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
>> Anyway, in order to let 'port install' suggest candidates or
>> alternatives based on binary names, we first need a database of
>> port contents.
>>
>> This use case would be an example what such
