Re: [150207] trunk/dports/perl/p5-net-cidr-lite/Portfile

> On Jul 13, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Jul 13, 2016, at 9:36 AM, m...@macports.org wrote: >> Or does simply stating “GPL” cover that already and that is why it has >> always been that way? > > 'GPL' by itself means 'any version of the GPL' > > From https://www.gnu.org/lic

Re: [150207] trunk/dports/perl/p5-net-cidr-lite/Portfile

On Jul 13, 2016, at 9:36 AM, m...@macports.org wrote: > Or does simply stating “GPL” cover that already and that is why it has always > been that way? 'GPL' by itself means 'any version of the GPL' From https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/old-licenses.html#GPL there appears to be no versi

Re: [150207] trunk/dports/perl/p5-net-cidr-lite/Portfile

Hi Dave, > On Jul 12, 2016, at 11:49 PM, dev...@macports.org wrote: > > Revision > 150207 Author > dev...@macports.org Date > 2016-07-12 22:49:03 -0700 (Tue, 12 Jul 2016) > Log Message > > p5-net-cidr-lite: license. > Modif

Getting someone to review and commit patch for ticket #51645

Dear MacPorts developers, I opened a ticket #51645 about 4 weeks ago that affects a library that my Portfiles rely on. I presume the owners of that package do not have the time right now to deal with it, so I also posted a patch in the ticket. Is there anyway to speed up the process for someone