On 2016-7-17 16:16 , Joshua Root wrote:
On 2016-7-17 15:31 , Watson Ladd wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to write a portfile for ChezScheme. The problem is that
they want you to run configure with an argument indicating the install
prefix, then don't seem to support DESTROOT. I've gone to upstream t
On 2016-7-17 16:02 , Watson Ladd wrote:
Dear all,
ChezScheme takes installprefix, not prefix as an arg, and having
prefix confuses it. I don't understand how to remove this unwanted
argument as I never put it in in the first place. I think once I have
this the portfile will be done.
Sincerely,
Wa
On 2016-7-17 15:31 , Watson Ladd wrote:
Dear all,
I'm trying to write a portfile for ChezScheme. The problem is that
they want you to run configure with an argument indicating the install
prefix, then don't seem to support DESTROOT. I've gone to upstream to
report this, but I understand there is
Dear all,
ChezScheme takes installprefix, not prefix as an arg, and having
prefix confuses it. I don't understand how to remove this unwanted
argument as I never put it in in the first place. I think once I have
this the portfile will be done.
Sincerely,
Watson
_
Dear all,
I'm trying to write a portfile for ChezScheme. The problem is that
they want you to run configure with an argument indicating the install
prefix, then don't seem to support DESTROOT. I've gone to upstream to
report this, but I understand there is black magic we could use
instead.
The sec
On Jul 15, 2016, at 11:21 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> so you're really just advocating that we remove the un-versioned license
>> shortcut totally?
>
> For licenses that have versions, I suppose yes, I am advocating that we
> always specify the version.
ok.
> I'm just suggesting we make a poli
