Now that we have the failcache (thanks!) what would be involved in getting a
successcache? If I want to do a build of "all" ports, I don't want to spend
time just activating and deactivating files of ports that already successfully
built.
___
macports
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 2:06 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> On Tuesday September 13 2016 01:39:41 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>
>> That's just the nature of things.
>
> Yeah, life sucks and all that ...
>
>> Do you have 3rd party menu extras? IIRC, you're on 10.9, and 3rd party menu
>>
>
> The trac port does something similar in post-destroot (copying some files
> into ${destroot}${prefix}/share/trac/contrib and then linking some things
> into ${destroot}${prefix}/bin) if you're looking for an example to help.
>
> --
> Daniel J. Luke
I see -- the trac port is very similar i
On Sep 13, 2016, at 12:45 AM, Ken Cunningham
wrote:
> To make it install as a command line app, I could xinstall the relevant parts
> of the build folder into ${prefix}/libexec/sshuttle,
${destroot}${prefix}/libexec/sshuttle (in post-destroot phase).
> and then use a system call to symlink the
I think the issue in this one is the Makefile, which basically needs to be
re-written as far as I can see.
I tried to give that a go a few weeks ago for you, but my Makefile-writing
skills are still too rudimentary. That is one cryptic language to both read and
write.
Perhaps one of the macpo
Hello,
Could you please take a look at the ticket
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51737,
Regards,
Izzat
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
On Tuesday September 13 2016 01:39:41 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
> That's just the nature of things.
Yeah, life sucks and all that ...
>Do you have 3rd party menu extras? IIRC, you're on 10.9, and 3rd party menu
>extras run in SystemUIServer. I frequently got SystemUIServer crashes than
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 00:14, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> On Monday September 12 2016 21:51:55 Jeremy Sequoia wrote:
>
> I can confirm that there *is* feedback on radars, though I do have to admit
> that in my case it is usually one of 3 forms:
> - works as intended
> - please check if the issu
On Monday September 12 2016 21:51:55 Jeremy Sequoia wrote:
I can confirm that there *is* feedback on radars, though I do have to admit
that in my case it is usually one of 3 forms:
- works as intended
- please check if the issue still exists in the latest release (typically
months later)
- pleas
