rednotebook

I tried to build rednotebook 1.8 [newest version] to test it out in my own repo. All went well until webkit-gtk-2.0 started to be built. I received a configure error. configure:17389: error: You need the GLib dev tools in your path Both glib-dbus and glib-networking were installed before the err

Re: port command

I will give it a try, now that gcc48 is installed. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2013, at 14:06, M. Daniel Becque wrote: > > > Can I use the following syntax to try to build boost now that gcc48 is > installed or do I have to

port command

Can I use the following syntax to try to build boost now that gcc48 is installed or do I have to use install to use configure.compiler? port upgrade boost configure.compiler=macports-gcc-4.8 ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org

tesseract port

An update to the Tesseract port has been submitted, ticket #38871. Could someone take a look at it and commit the changes? dan ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforg

unpaper port

I noticed that unpaper is now abandoned. Looking at other port files I thought I would make a naive stab at a port update for unpaper. I contacted flameeyes and he reponded with this: "In general I think you should look at the most basic autoconf-based port file, as the main difference between

Re: ticket #40385 - boost

I posted the bootstrap.log file to the ticket. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Sep 18, 2013, at 21:40, M. Daniel Becque wrote: > > > Could someone take a look at this ticket. I posted my build log because > I think I am getting the same error o

ticket #40385 - boost

Could someone take a look at this ticket. I posted my build log because I think I am getting the same error on a G5 PPC running Leopard 10.5.8. I was not doing a universal build. Thanks -dan ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org

Re: [MacPorts] #35148: gegl 0.2.0_0 Syntax error before 'AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_6_AND_LATER'

denote when something was added to the *system*. > > I've commented as such in the gnome bug report and will give them a patch > to address this immediate issue. > > > On Sep 3, 2012, at 10:11, M. Daniel Becque wrote: > > > I have Xcode 3.1.4 installed on my 10.5.8

Re: [MacPorts] #35963: libwpd @0.9.4 Build failure - make

Attached to the ticket. On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:11 AM, MacPorts wrote: > #35963: libwpd @0.9.4 Build failure - make > > +--- > Reporter: mdbecque@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… > Type: defect

Re: [MacPorts] #35148: gegl 0.2.0_0 Syntax error before 'AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_6_AND_LATER'

I have Xcode 3.1.4 installed on my 10.5.8 PPC so I selected the GCC-3.3 compiler as suggested. The build fails and I get the following in my log file. :info:configure checking for gcc... /Developer/usr/bin/gcc-3.3 :info:configure checking whether the C compiler works... no :info:configure configur

Fwd: [MacPorts] #35148: gegl 0.2.0_0 Syntax error before 'AVAILABLE_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_6_AND_LATER'

I don't know enough about how to select a different compiler; can someone give me an idea and I'll be glad to try it out. Thanks in advance, dan -- Forwarded message -- From: MacPorts Date: Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [MacPorts] #35148: gegl 0.2.0_0 Syntax error bef

gegl upgrade

Upgrading Gegl from 0.1.8_2 to 0.2.0_0 fails on my machine [ticket filed]. I am thinking that maybe the upgrade is trying to do a universal build but when I look at the active version of Gegl on my machine I get *gegl @0.1.8_2+python27 (active). *To test this theory can I make sure the upgrade is t

Re: [MacPorts] #34631: Atlas 3.9.75_0 Configure error - build failure

My log file is unchanged by the patch. I noticed that Ryan changed the ticket title. I get the same UNKNOWN COMPILER message. -dan On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 1:03 AM, MacPorts wrote: > #34631: Atlas 3.9.75_0 Configure error - build failure > > +-

Re: portindex

Ok: it seemed to be behaving like this but thought that i would make sure. Thanks On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > > I created a local repository and used it successfully. There are 2 port > files that i would like to remove and then revise my index. Should I just > dele

portindex

I created a local repository and used it successfully. There are 2 port files that i would like to remove and then revise my index. Should I just delete the folders with the port files in them and then rerun the portindex command? Does that rebuild the portindex files? _

Re: local portfile repository

Ok. will do. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > > I followed the guide [i think] but I did it from Finder. In my home > directory I created ports/net/proftpd_sftp. I gave it a different name so > that there would be no problem with the macports version. I then copied the >

local portfile repository

I followed the guide [i think] but I did it from Finder. In my home directory I created ports/net/proftpd_sftp. I gave it a different name so that there would be no problem with the macports version. I then copied the portfile for proftpd to my local repository and edited it with Textwrangler to st

Re: sha1 and rmd160

Arno, The proftpd repository has an md5 file along with the binary. Does that mean i must use md5 or can I, as you suggest, upgrade to the rmd160 and sha256 hashes by generating them using openssl like below? Once I have those hashes I could then just include them in the port as checksums rather th

Re: sha1 and rmd160

I had looked at the guide and didn't understand at first what I saw. I see the openssl solution in point #13 staring me in the face. Yikes. The checksum addition to the port command will be interesting to try as well. Thank you On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote: > At 11:54 PM

sha1 and rmd160

I'm working on upgrading the port of Proftpd from 1.3.3c to 1.3.3g as a first step. From the binary file repository i see where the md5 # comes from but how do you get the sha1 and rmd160 numbers to place in the port file? There is another file with each release, .asc, in the repository. Thanks D