I use git (and Github Enterprise) in my day to day work. I can help out.
Another good (free (as in beer)) client is SourceTree
https://www.sourcetreeapp.com/
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
> Here are some resources GitHub re
Yeah, no one wants Github to be the new SF. Thankfully, git helps there, we
can pick up and move anytime. Also, it's a bit less once size fits all
thing than SF. SF had everything. Github is more focused. The lack of ads
and the pay to play system makes me feel better about it.
—Mark
_
This is super exciting. I can ditch my weird github workflow and have my
own proper fork. And I agree, github issues really are terrible, glad to
see we're sticking with trac.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:28 PM, C. R. Oldham wrote:
>
>
>
> On August
I vote for killing a lot of them. Apache 1 for instance is a very bad thing
to be running right now. If they are EOL upstream, keeping them around is
also a bit of false hope to people that might need them. I know I for one
could not fix some of these builds since I don't have old enough OSes, and
Oh thank god. I was afraid MacOSForge was circling the drain.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Eneko Gotzon wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Ian Wadham wrote:
>
>> find some time to answer queries on the list…
>>
> I have learned so m
Feels like MacOSForge is circling the drain. XQuartz left. Now we're having
nothing but trouble.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 2015, at 4:45 PM,
I dunno, but it seems like we're easily the most active project on here.
Followed by XQuartz maybe. All this down time certainly makes me nervous.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 5:49 AM, Mojca Miklave
Sorry, I mean 10.11, and I'm looking for 10.10 to test on. Classic off by
one.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
> Quick update on what I saw, on 10.10 it dies due to lack of 10.8 SDK and
> once I fixed th
Quick update on what I saw, on 10.10 it dies due to lack of 10.8 SDK and
once I fixed that, garbage collection is not supported so Xcode 7 will not
compile it. Obviously not a direct problem now, but will be shortly.
I'm going to see if I can dig up a 10.9 machine image to test on.
—Mark
___
I second perl 5.22. And that we should only support the latest perl.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> > On Jul 14, 2015, at 12:22 PM, David Evans wrote:
> > My point in being cautious has to do with fact that perl5.22 has
I agree. Sometimes even I use these methods instead of MacPorts, but I
usually try to get Macports to work as hard as I can. VLC is the one
offender that really doesn't want to build sometimes.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
Whoops. Yeah, thanks for the fix.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:10 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #47685: tesseract @3.02.02_2: needs license
> +--
> Reporter: larryv@… | Owner: emer@…
> Type: defe
I love it. I agree with Ryan, I think a portfile Editor/IDE should be a
separate MacPorts.framework project from Pallet.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 5:14 PM, Kyle Sammons wrote:
>
> > My name's Kyle S
Yeah, I'm waiting to see what tesseract does. I'm hoping since its a google
project, it won't be abandoned. The upside is you can migrate any project
to github yourself. You don't have to own it.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Niels Dettenbach (Sy
Do we have any idea what we need to do/should do to prepare for the
eventual shutdown of google code? I know a lot of stuff has been abandoning
it, but I feel like we've got quite a few ports out there that will be hit.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
_
Yeah. I think bumping it to 5.20 is the best idea, as we slowly move toward
toward the goal of One Perl to Rule Them All. Or whatever we wind up doing.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Ryan
I do like the idea of a forum or something. Gmail helps with conversation
management, but trying to find conversations from long ago, even with the
archive kinda sucks. Especially for those of us that have mail back when
this was "darwinports"
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Tu
Tesseract is moving it's files to Google Drive since Google Code no longer
allows uploads. Do we have a way to download from google drive? Should we?
Or should I just pull a tag from subversion?
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
___
macport
I just started looking at it. Whew. That is a quite a Portfile. We should
file a ticket to get it to 0.10.0, but as it's nomaintainer, I doubt anyone
will mind you working on it. In fact, I'd encourage it.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Craig Trel
Cool. Totally slipped my mind.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:11 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #46004: perl5.18: update to 5.18.4
> ---+
> Reporter: mojca@… | Owner: emer@…
> Type: update| Statu
I have a patch in this ticket to upgrade iTerm2 to v 2.0 - Should we change
the name of the ticket or start a new one?
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:32 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #43311: iTerm2: update to 1.0.0.20140403
> -+
Yeah, I'm with Daniel here. I think we should only support the latest
version of Perl.
>From perl.org: "*We recommend that you always run the latest stable
version, currently 5.20.0"*
The whole reason we are in this mess is that long gap you see between 5.8
and 5.10 when we all thought Perl 6 was
Yeah, that's been on the backburner for me for a while. I have a path to
upgrade now, so I'll get on that.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #41660: geda-gaf @1.6.2_0 (epoch 1): Update port to stable-1.8.2
>
I sadly have not had enough time to work on cpan-mp, I've been mostly
learning the internals of macports first. But yeah, like I said on that
other thread, the latest perl is enough. Back when 5.x stalled because
everyone thought 6 was coming out it was ok to stay still. But now we get
new Perls re
I (and I think Daniel Luke) just want to abolish all but the latest Perl.
We allow the installing of perls that have LONG since gone out of updates.
Perl goes out of its way to be backwards compatable. You have to do things
like "use 5.16" to even use new features that break stuff.
Mark
—Mark
___
Love those ideas. Perl 6 is totally different so yeah, that'd be separate.
I'd like to see this expand to other package managers as well. pip, gems,
npm, and weird things that need supporting like rvm.
But Perl is my wheelhouse, so I'm starting there. Also, I think it needs
the most work right now
2014, at 1:20 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >> I know we've argued about this time and time again, but Perl issues are
> coming back up it seems. I've started work - admittedly not getting very
> far on the cpan-mp idea. I'm still trying to figure out
;
> Shree
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
> Yeah, I continue to get "up-to-date" on my git pull upstream masters. I
> could have sworn more work was going on.
>
> Mark
>
> --Mark
> ___
> Mark E. Anderson
I know we've argued about this time and time again, but Perl issues are
coming back up it seems. I've started work - admittedly not getting very
far on the cpan-mp idea. I'm still trying to figure out /base to be honest
and brush off my Perl-XS skills.
I feel like we have had this argument again a
If I can get myself to Europe. Depends on where and when.
--Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious how many people would be willing and able to join if we
> organized a 3-5 day long developer meeting somewhere
Yeah, I continue to get "up-to-date" on my git pull upstream masters. I
could have sworn more work was going on.
Mark
--Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2014-04-03 21:24, Shreeraj Karulkar wrote:
> > I have changed it. TH
sync certainly works with git as well.
--Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2014, at 02:46, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> > Despite the fact that I kept pushing a couple of other projects to
> > switch to a different ve
ns.org> wrote:
> Google shows there are plugins available.
>
> Is there somethign specific you're interested in seeing?
>
> On Mar 18, 2014, at 22:15, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
> > Does our install of Trac have an
Related side question:
Does our install of Trac have any public APIs (XMLRPC, REST, SOAP,
whatever)?
Mark
--Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2014, at 11:40 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> However I would also agr
Ok. I'm willing to play ball on that. Also since Atlassian products are
pretty cool. I just like the idea of a more modern workflow. If I got a
vote, which I suppose I don't, It would be git/github, but hg/bitbucket is
ok. Git/bitbucket is what I use on the side as well.
--Mark
___
Yeah, I agree with Ivan, the big deal is Github. Git is great, but hg
offers a lot of the same stuff. As to Ryan's objections, I too had those
same objections after working with SVN and CVS for almost 2 decades. But
once I switched, I wondered why I hadn't switched earlier. I'm sure those
of us in
Yeah, I actually like the idea of GitHub for the idea of pull requests. So
much so, I mirror the Macports on github, make my changes in branches and
make patches for SVN there. I'm certain we could save all the history we
needed. I've made this shift several times on a few projects.
I even have ba
.com/markemer/Macports
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Eric Gallager
> wrote:
> > Do you have a link to your fork on Github? I would like to "star" it.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >> S
So I've started messing around with getting a Proof of Concept CPAN->MP
link working, so we don't need to have to have 8 billion perl ports. This
was an idea on a thread long ago. I'll be keeping a github branch in my
fork as soon as I get something that resembles something that isn't "how in
the h
3, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2013, at 16:07, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
> > I like the idea of a port select like python, which as worked well for
> me. With python, in most cases, I can just keep the most current 2.x and
> most current 3.x. I'm n
+ Macports-dev
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark Anderson
Date: Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: changing default perl
To: Ryan Schmidt
I like the idea of a port select like python, which as worked well for me.
With python, in most cases, I can just keep the most
Will xcode-select --install work right without XCode.app? I do OSX and Mac
Dev, so I always have it, but I'm curious to try now.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article ,
> Paul Bennett wrote:
>
> > On 30 Oct 2013, at 23:
6:50 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2013-10-29 04:54, Joshua Root wrote:
> > On 2013-10-29 14:36 , Mark Anderson wrote:
> >> What's the status of Macports_Framework? I was looking in SVN and the
> >> last commit was 6 years ago. I was looking to work on it, is th
Ok, thanks, I thought their had to be. I must be looking in the wrong spot.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2013-10-29 14:36 , Mark Anderson wrote:
> > What's the status of Macports_Framework? I was look
What's the status of Macports_Framework? I was looking in SVN and the last
commit was 6 years ago. I was looking to work on it, is that the latest?
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforg
Ok, so I just needed to RTFM, I had a feeling. Thanks!
Mark
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> At 7:30 PM -0400 10/2/13, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
>> I submitted two tickets 40653 and 40654 with patch
I submitted two tickets 40653 and 40654 with patches, that are
nomaintainer. I would be willing to take them over, but I wasn't sure how I
was supposed to do that. Just declare myself the maintainer? I also
contributed a perl 5.18 Portfile, which seems to have a maintainer +
openmaintainer. I'd was
Oh ok. Thanks. That's the kind of thing I was wondering about.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2013, at 17:01, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
> > Here is my more important question: What other things n
I've managed to get Perl 5.18 to compile and run. I'm wondering, has anyone
started the effort for a perl 5.18.1 port? If not, I'll open a ticket and
start prettying up my port.
Here is my more important question: What other things need to be done to
bring up a new perl? I know perl5 needs to be m
I have access, and I can't really discuss problems here because of the
strict NDA. I've been trying to find solutions, but I'm on my own. That
said, a lot of changes will need to be made for Mavericks, but that's
nothing new. Every update is like this.
Mark
—Mark
___
Mark E. A
Doh. Perhaps it works better pre-release. I certainly recommend people on
Mavericks to report early and often.
Mark
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Mark Anderson wrote:
> > Oh
.
I think a good start is what Ryan suggested. Start to bundle tcl 8.5 with
MacPorts and then move it to 8.6 unrelated to what Apple does.
Mark
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2013-07-07 20:51, Mark Anderson wr
Yeah, this perl situation drives me crazy. I always wind up accidentally
installing 5.12 when I don't want to, and I still have yet to install 5.18,
although I am looking at how to build that. I'm with Daniel. We should just
keep the latest stable(5.18) and p5-* and keep the perl5-XXs around if you
at 07:19:38PM -0400, Mark Anderson wrote:
> > I kind of like the idea Ryan was talking about where we build using a
> > portfile or something, and then squirrel the files away someplace away
> > from the main install.
>
> So we have to create a script that will relocate an in
Yeah, I've actually currently built against the MacPorts Tcl. I don't
recommend it, but it was the easiest way to rebuild between developer
seeds. I kind of like the idea Ryan was talking about where we build using
a portfile or something, and then squirrel the files away someplace away
from the ma
n Schmidt wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2013, at 17:50, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
> > I'm starting to wonder if we should include a bootstrapping version of
> Tcl with Macports, in case some future version of OSX ships with a broken
> version. Any thoughts?
>
> Yes, that topic recent
I'm starting to wonder if we should include a bootstrapping version of Tcl
with Macports, in case some future version of OSX ships with a broken
version. Any thoughts?
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
___
macports-dev mailing list
macport
I have a short term workaround to anyone who is also under the NDA.
I'm trying to come up with a long term solution. Email me if you are
in the Mac Developer Program and would like that info. I'm certain I
can't post it publicly here. We should probably set up a MacPorts-dev
discussion topic over i
April 23 - May 23 is one month.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:50 PM, David Strubbe wrote:
> Yes, sorry I lost a digit, I do mean #38901. I agree it says "opened 4
> weeks ago" but it was created April 23. Since it is May 19, I count that as
> just 4
Can you attach the log it's talking about? Probably config.log in
/opt/local/var/macports/
build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_textproc_tesseract/tesseract/work/tesseract-3.01
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:16 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #32907: tesseract
I think your patch is the best we are going to do until 3.02 comes out,
which I am told is "soon".
Mark
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:43 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #32075: Tesseract update to 3.01
>
> -+--
> Reporter: emer@…
Yeah, that might be the best. I was never that fond of the way we handled
it, but at the time this was the only choice. Subports sound like a great
idea.
Mark
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:34 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #32075: Tesseract update to 3.01
>
> -+--
Sure. Sorry about that. Thought I was supposed to notify the list.
Mark
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 12:55, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
> > Can someone test and commit the Tesseract Upgrade. It was pretty
> painless.
> >
> >
Can someone test and commit the Tesseract Upgrade. It was pretty painless.
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/32075
Thanks,
Mark
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
Anyone else getting a checksum fail on tex-gantt in the repo, or is it just
me?
Mark
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
Also, do the raw system frameworks include the headers? I don't have a
un-developer-tooled machine to look.
We could always resort to class-dump. :-)
Mark
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:45 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
>
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> > On 03/18/2011 04:40 P
So far I've been running XCode 4 with MacPorts and have not run into any
trouble. I'll holler as soon as it causes a problem.
Mark
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Dominik Reichardt wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> I have to admit that I have no idea if and to which extent MacPorts
> >>> works with Xcode
A new diff has been attached that adds leptonica as a dependency. Give it a
shot, otherwise, I think this works.
Mark
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
Can you attach a diff for the portfile?
Also, for the rest of the group, I'm probably going to need to add a
leptonica port, as this is probably the last tesseract that will compile
without it. We'll probably want to add that soon too.
Mark
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:13 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #
I've been noticing during long compiles on my older box, mdworker and
other spotlight goodies start eating CPU time. Has anyone else
noticed this? And if so, should we have an option to turn off
spotlight? That might speed up some compiles on older boxes.
Mark
__
I can give it a look on Sunday. I'm planning to use cpan2port, so you
may want to give that a try that yourself, might (I stress might) be
easy.
Mark
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Steve Morris wrote:
> Is it possible to get the CPAN package Mac::Growl ported?
>
> Thanks
> __
Hey, thanks, I've been meaning to update this.
Mark
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:34 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #24723: geda-gaf update to 1.6.1
> -+--
> Reporter: and.dam...@… | Owner: e...@…
> Type: update
ld -r -o libtesseract_full.o tesseractfull.o \
libtesseract_main.a \
../textord/libtesseract_textord.a \
../pageseg/libtesseract_pageseg.a \
../wordrec/libtesseract_wordrec.a \
../classify/libtesseract_classify.a \
../dict/libtesseract_dict.a \
../viewer/libtesseract_vie
I'll see if there are some upstream patches yet to fix this.
Mark
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:36 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #24446: tesseract segfaults with input filename extension tiff
> -+--
> Reporter: ryandes...@…
I have added a PCB Portfile patch that brings it to the latest
version. Can the maintainer/someone with authority test and commit
it?
Mark
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/m
That should probably be bumped to 20091103? Submit a ticket on the
website ( http://www.macports.org ) asking for an upgrade.
I have a patch that might work, but Adam is the maintainer, so he'll
have to approve the changes.
Mark
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Donald Tillman wrote:
> [try aga
Can someone please commit ticket 22512? I have a diff attached that
should fix geda-gaf's problem.
Mark
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
I posted a diff with the workaround, gEDA doesn't really need it
anyway. It did not error for me, however. Did you build on Quartz or
X11, and do you have Gnome installed?
Mark
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:20 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #22512: geda-gaf 1.6.0 complains about missing update-desktop-data
I see it attached. Is it not building?
Mark
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
> Where is the new Portfile? It's not on the ticket.
>
>
> Cheers!
> Frank
>
> On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:13 PM, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
>> Ok, well I fixed it and
Cheers!
> Frank
>
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
>> Ok, so I screwed this port file up a bit. I forgot to add the
>> dependencies. Should I post a new Portfile, or a diff. Also, once
>> I've done that can someone commit it?
>>
>> On
Ok, so I screwed this port file up a bit. I forgot to add the
dependencies. Should I post a new Portfile, or a diff. Also, once
I've done that can someone commit it?
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:52 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #6: gEDA Port Submission
> ---+-
Yeah, I was going to do something similar. Thanks. I'll have to start
checking against Case-Sensitive file systems.
Mark
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:15 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #19748: tesseract: fails doing "make install"
>
> +
Can I get some more information on this? (OS, system, etc)
It builds fine on my machine. Not a whole lot goes on in the java directory.
Mark
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:22 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #19681: tesseract fails to stage
>
> +
Whoops. Uploaded a 2.03 diff.
Mark
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, MacPorts wrote:
> #18077: tesseract: upgrade to 2.03
> ---+
> Reporter: ste...@… | Owner: e...@…
> Type: enhancement
Ok, I've attached a new Portfile to the Ticket. All that was needed
was a version and checksum update. Try it out, and let me know if you
run into trouble.
Mark
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:41 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #18077: tesseract: upgrade to 2.03
> ---+-
I'm on it. I really don't think it should be a big deal.
Mark
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:41 AM, MacPorts wrote:
> #18077: tesseract: upgrade to 2.03
> ---+
> Reporter: ste...@… | Owner: e...@…
> T
86 matches
Mail list logo
