On 4/23/14 9:11 AM, Daniel wrote:
> David,
>
> Would you please take over as maintainer of the port?
>
>
>
Done in r119384.
What about these ports? Do you wish to continue to maintain them or
should we remove you as maintainer from them as well?
$ port echo maintainer:nefar
hyperic-sigar
David,
Would you please take over as maintainer of the port?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:54 PM, David Evans wrote:
> On 4/4/14 4:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 4/4/14 1:22 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >>> You should use a specific version of perl instead, like perl5.16.
> > Maybe I take that b
On 4/4/14 4:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On 4/4/14 1:22 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> You should use a specific version of perl instead, like perl5.16.
> Maybe I take that back, because:
>
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 07:44, Eric Gallager wrote:
>
>> I thought we were doing variants now, when the dependency
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 18:05, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > If they're pure perl then that might work; if there's any XS involved
> then a hard version dependency would be needed.
>
> How would we determine that?
> I don’t know enough about perl to k
On 2014-4-5 10:46 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 18:05, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> In this case, the dependency isn’t for more than just the perl executable,
>>> is it? The port does build and install perl modules, but it ins
On Apr 4, 2014, at 18:05, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> In this case, the dependency isn’t for more than just the perl executable,
>> is it? The port does build and install perl modules, but it installs them in
>> a pidgin-specific location, not
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> In this case, the dependency isn’t for more than just the perl executable,
> is it? The port does build and install perl modules, but it installs them
> in a pidgin-specific location, not in the versioned directory for whatever
> version of per
> On 4/4/14 1:22 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> You should use a specific version of perl instead, like perl5.16.
Maybe I take that back, because:
On Apr 4, 2014, at 07:44, Eric Gallager wrote:
> I thought we were doing variants now, when the dependency is for more
> than just the "perl" execut
On 4/4/14 1:22 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 00:03, dev...@macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision
>> 118533
>> Author
>> dev...@macports.org
>> Date
>> 2014-04-03 22:03:33 -0700 (Thu, 03 Apr 2014)
>> Log Message
>>
>> pidgin: depend on perl5, increment revision to rebuild archived binary
I thought we were doing variants now, when the dependency is for more
than just the "perl" executable, at least:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43193
On 4/4/14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 00:03, dev...@macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision
>> 118533
>> Author
>> dev...@macports.org
On Apr 4, 2014, at 00:03, dev...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision
> 118533
> Author
> dev...@macports.org
> Date
> 2014-04-03 22:03:33 -0700 (Thu, 03 Apr 2014)
> Log Message
>
> pidgin: depend on perl5, increment revision to rebuild archived binary with
> latest default version (#42213), maintain
11 matches
Mail list logo
