On Aug 9, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
On 2014-8-10 04:07 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
On Aug 9, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Frank Schima m...@macports.org wrote:
Just curious about why you are removing the indenting spacing in these perl
ports? I would say it is more
Modified: trunk/dports/perl/p5-email-mime-contenttype/Portfile (123422 =
123423)
--- trunk/dports/perl/p5-email-mime-contenttype/Portfile 2014-08-09
10:46:40 UTC (rev 123422)
+++ trunk/dports/perl/p5-email-mime-contenttype/Portfile 2014-08-09
10:49:13 UTC (rev 123423
On Aug 9, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Frank Schima m...@macports.org wrote:
Just curious about why you are removing the indenting spacing in these perl
ports? I would say it is more common to indent in blocks. I’m open to a
discussion about what is preferred. I know when I edit p5 and other ports, I
On Aug 9, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Lawrence Velázquez lar...@macports.org wrote:
On Aug 9, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Frank Schima m...@macports.org wrote:
Just curious about why you are removing the indenting spacing in these perl
ports? I would say it is more common to indent in blocks. I’m open to
On 8/9/14 12:46 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
On Aug 9, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Lawrence Velázquez lar...@macports.org wrote:
On Aug 9, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Frank Schima m...@macports.org wrote:
Just curious about why you are removing the indenting spacing in these perl
ports? I would say it is more
On Aug 9, 2014, at 4:41 PM, David Evans dev...@macports.org wrote:
On 8/9/14 12:46 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
I think the code looks better indented. But I will stay with the consensus
on this (of course).
+1 for Frank's position here. I've been adding the 4 spaces when
updating perl
On 8/9/14 12:46 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
I think the code looks better indented. But I will stay with the consensus
on this (of course).
+1
But, I think, the removal of all these actually needed indentions were surely
not intended by Mojca!
(It’s probably just a glitch in the script used for
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Marko Käning wrote:
On 8/9/14 12:46 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
I think the code looks better indented. But I will stay with the consensus
on this (of course).
+1
But, I think, the removal of all these actually needed indentions were surely
not intended by
