> On Nov 1, 2014, at 5:26 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> The revision field is used to cause users to rebuild a port, so only increase
> the revision if users would benefit by rebuilding.
or if the files installed by the port have changed/moved in any way.
--
Daniel J. Luke
On Oct 31, 2014, at 9:55 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2014-11-1 03:51 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Kurt Hindenburg wrote:
>>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
Thanks, but note that because the contents of the tarballs is identical,
th
On 2014-11-1 03:51 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Kurt Hindenburg
> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, but note that because the contents of the tarballs is identical,
>>> there was no need to increase the revision.
>>
>> I
On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Kurt Hindenburg wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Thanks, but note that because the contents of the tarballs is identical,
>> there was no need to increase the revision.
>
> I was under the impression since the checksums were differe
t 2014)
>> Log Message
>>
>> git-extras: set the correct github repo
>> Modified Paths
>>
>> • trunk/dports/devel/git-extras/Portfile
>> Diff
>>
>> Modified: trunk/dports/devel/git-extras/Portfile (127648 => 127649)
>>
>> --- t
> • trunk/dports/devel/git-extras/Portfile
> Diff
>
> Modified: trunk/dports/devel/git-extras/Portfile (127648 => 127649)
>
> --- trunk/dports/devel/git-extras/Portfile2014-10-31 13:15:35 UTC (rev
> 127648)
> +++ trunk/dports/devel/git-extras/Por
