On Dec 7, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Kurt Hindenburg wrote:
> When we remove ports, is there anything to do about the orphaned files on
> their system?
No files are "orphaned". If a user installs a port that we later delete, their
copy of the port remains installed and is listed by `port installed obso
On Dec 7, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2014-12-8 05:38 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> If you're going to prevent installation, you might as well just delete the
>> port. The reason we keep obsolete ports around for a year is to give users a
>> chance to upgrade to the replaceme
On 2014-12-8 05:38 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> Why is this port obsolete? Does it not work? Has upstream development ceased?
See the discussion in the ticket.
> What do you mean "there are better ways of installing vim plugins"? One
> could say the same thing about Python/Perl/PHP/Ruby modules,
w installing #38165
> Modified Paths
>
> trunk/dports/editors/NERD_tree/Portfile
>
> Diff
>
> <>Modified: trunk/dports/editors/NERD_tree/Portfile (129140 => 129141)
>
> --- trunk/dports/editors/NERD_tree/Portfile 2014-12-07 18:21:51 UTC (rev
> 129140)
>
