Re: [27033] trunk/dports/textproc/chmlib/Portfile

2007-07-15 Thread markd
Mark Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sunday, July 15, 2007 at 10:50 PM -0800 wrote: >I suppose not, I just figured people whom are installing it as a >conduit to another app or a library for their own applications would >not want 6 additional binaries hanging out in /opt/local/bin. > >I'll happily

Re: [27033] trunk/dports/textproc/chmlib/Portfile

2007-07-15 Thread Mark Grimes
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:41:49 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org on Sunday, July 15, 2007 at 9:53 PM > -0800 wrote: >> Log Message >> >> Add examples variant. >> >> This includes useful tools that use chmlib. For example, >> extract_chmLib takes a chm file and extr

Re: [27033] trunk/dports/textproc/chmlib/Portfile

2007-07-15 Thread markd
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org on Sunday, July 15, 2007 at 9:53 PM -0800 wrote: >Log Message > >Add examples variant. > >This includes useful tools that use chmlib. For example, >extract_chmLib takes a chm file and extracts it to a directory. > >72 hour rule. > > >Modified Paths > > [ >fcp