On 2009-08-20 13:11 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Doesn't the revision need to go higher, not lower?
Revision got to 1 from 0 at adding the patch, now it is 2 after removing
the patch, which is fine. This will cause unnecessary rebuilds for most
people, but we do not have a better way to handle
Doesn't the revision need to go higher, not lower?
On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:06 AM, takan...@macports.org wrote:
Modified: trunk/dports/devel/autoconf/Portfile (55847 = 55848)
--- trunk/dports/devel/autoconf/Portfile 2009-08-20 10:54:07 UTC
(rev 55847)
+++ trunk/dports/devel/autoconf/Portfile
On Aug 20, 2009, at 06:06, takan...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 55848
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/55848
Author: takan...@macports.org
Date: 2009-08-20 04:06:35 -0700 (Thu, 20 Aug 2009)
Log Message:
---
autoconf: Revert to r54421. Seems that patch-
