Re: [63519] trunk/dports/devel/gmp/Portfile

2010-02-17 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2010-02-14 08:43:48 -0700, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > At the web page http://gmplib.org/gmp5.0.html, the developers of GMP claim: > "GMP 5.0 is upwardly source and binary compatible with 4.x, and 3.x versions" It doesn't say that exactly. I read: "GMP 5.0 is upwardly source and binary com

Re: [63519] trunk/dports/devel/gmp/Portfile

2010-02-14 Thread Marcus Calhoun-Lopez
At the web page http://gmplib.org/gmp5.0.html, the developers of GMP claim: "GMP 5.0 is upwardly source and binary compatible with 4.x, and 3.x versions" Is this the bug you were referring to? -Marcus On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2010-02-06 18:27:12 -080

Re: [63519] trunk/dports/devel/gmp/Portfile

2010-02-08 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, On 2010-02-06 18:27:12 -0800, mcalh...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 63519 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/63519 > Author: mcalh...@macports.org > Date: 2010-02-06 18:27:10 -0800 (Sat, 06 Feb 2010) > Log Message: > --- > gmp: Update version 4.3.2 --> 5.0.1. [...]