On 2010-04-01 09:29 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:06, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> But if we want to lower priority, we would only have to add
>> configure.nice/destroot.nice options to portconfigure/portdestroot.
>
> For the benefit of those quirky ports that for whatever reason do
>
On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:06, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2010-03-21 11:07 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Do you suppose it would be nice to use setpriority in other phases as
>> well? There are some ports that, though perhaps they shouldn't,
>> compile in either the configure or destroot phases; perhaps th
On 2010-03-21 11:07 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Do you suppose it would be nice to use setpriority in other phases as
> well? There are some ports that, though perhaps they shouldn't,
> compile in either the configure or destroot phases; perhaps they
> should use lower priority then too. Even ports tha
On Mar 21, 2010, at 00:03, rai...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 65076
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/65076
> Author: rai...@macports.org
> Date: 2010-03-20 22:03:24 -0700 (Sat, 20 Mar 2010)
> Log Message:
> ---
> port1.0: Use setpriority(2) in proc system instead of
