Modified: trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile
===
--- trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile 2012-04-12 03:38:31 UTC (rev
91864)
+++ trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile 2012-04-12 03:44:42 UTC (rev
91865)
@@ -5,7
On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the revision.
epoch: 1
version: 4.2
revision: 2
The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1 BTW.
- Josh
___
macports-dev
On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the
revision.
epoch: 1
version: 4.2
revision: 2
The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1
BTW.
Wasn't there a second
On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote:
On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the
revision.
epoch: 1
version: 4.2
revision: 2
The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is
On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote:
On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the
revision.
epoch: 1
version: 4.2
revision: 2
The
On 2012-4-13 13:40 , Eric Cronin wrote:
On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote:
Wasn't there a second issue that the filenames for packages don't
include epoch, so there is a risk of grabbing/reusing the package from a
different epoch if the
