On Dec 11, 2008, at 08:18, Takeshi Enomoto wrote:
I think scientific users want not universal (i386 and ppc) but 64-
bit (x86_64 and ppc64)
if they have a 64-bit machine.
In MacPorts 1.6.0, "universal" means "i386 ppc" but in MacPorts 1.7.0
and up, it only means "build for multiple archit
I think scientific users want not universal (i386 and ppc) but 64-bit
(x86_64 and ppc64)
if they have a 64-bit machine.
If a package is build for all the four (i386 x86_64 ppc ppc64),
there will be not problem but it is not always easy to support this.
For example source in fortran is problem
Joshua Root wrote:
Also, what about ports where building 64bit is easier than
universal, if
there are such ports?
Hang on, can configure.m64 be set in macports.conf?
Nope. (not yet)
Overridden on the command line?
Sure. (try it)
I thought it could be, and if not, then it should be.
Bryan Blackburn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 06:10:48AM +1100, Joshua Root said:
>> Toby Peterson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Bryan Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Currently there are only a few ports with 64bit variants:
nbench-byte +use_64_bit
ubench
On Dec 8, 2008, at 15:29, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
So if someone wants to have 64bit support from a port, they'll need
to build
it +universal? This would have to require people adding the requisite
setting to universal_archs in macports.conf as well right, since
trunk still
specifies only '
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 06:10:48AM +1100, Joshua Root said:
> Toby Peterson wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Bryan Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Currently there are only a few ports with 64bit variants:
> >>
> >> nbench-byte +use_64_bit
> >> ubench +use_64_bit
> >> judy +bi
Toby Peterson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Bryan Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Currently there are only a few ports with 64bit variants:
>>
>> nbench-byte +use_64_bit
>> ubench +use_64_bit
>> judy +bit64
>> john-devel +use_64_bit
>>
>> (john-devel was updated with 64bit su
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Bryan Blackburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently there are only a few ports with 64bit variants:
>
> nbench-byte +use_64_bit
> ubench +use_64_bit
> judy +bit64
> john-devel +use_64_bit
>
> (john-devel was updated with 64bit support by me, picking the more c
On Sunday, December 07, 2008, at 09:59PM, "Bryan Blackburn" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Before there are many more ports with such variants, we need to decide on a
>standard name; I found that +64bit isn't liked by port as it thinks that is
>the name of a port, not a variant so I guess it doesn't
Currently there are only a few ports with 64bit variants:
nbench-byte +use_64_bit
ubench +use_64_bit
judy +bit64
john-devel +use_64_bit
(john-devel was updated with 64bit support by me, picking the more common
name).
Before there are many more ports with such variants, we need to decide on a
10 matches
Mail list logo
