Workaround is 'extract.asroot yes', BTW. (Obviously doesn't help for
non-root installations.)
On 2013-1-15 10:06 , William Siegrist wrote:
> I don't think we want to have a mix of patches applied to the buildbots,
> since it makes reproducing problems harder. It might be useful to have the
> bas
On 01/14/2013 03:19 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Jan 14, 2013, at 6:06 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
I don't think we want to have a mix of patches applied to the buildbots, since
it makes reproducing problems harder. It might be useful to have the base
builder install the result of each build
On Jan 14, 2013, at 6:06 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
> I don't think we want to have a mix of patches applied to the buildbots,
> since it makes reproducing problems harder. It might be useful to have the
> base builder install the result of each build such that the ports builder
> will use it
I don't think we want to have a mix of patches applied to the buildbots, since
it makes reproducing problems harder. It might be useful to have the base
builder install the result of each build such that the ports builder will use
it (so the ports builder effectively uses trunk), but that probab
On 01/11/2013 08:48 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Can somebody who has access to the build bots review the following
commits and apply them:
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/101503
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/101504
Right now it's causing cg-toolkit failure because the process doesn't
have
Can somebody who has access to the build bots review the following
commits and apply them:
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/101503
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/101504
Right now it's causing cg-toolkit failure because the process doesn't
have the right to copy what it needs out of the