Re: Death of Google Code

2015-03-13 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Friday March 13 2015 14:34:38 Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >A rough count: > >% find ~/Projects/MacPorts/git-svn/trunk/dports \ >> -name Portfile -exec grep googlecode {} + | >pipe> wc -l > 265 >% find ~/Projects/MacPorts/git-svn/trunk/dports \ >>

Re: Death of Google Code

2015-03-13 Thread Mark Anderson
Yeah, I'm waiting to see what tesseract does. I'm hoping since its a google project, it won't be abandoned. The upside is you can migrate any project to github yourself. You don't have to own it. —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Niels Dettenbach (Sy

Re: Death of Google Code

2015-03-13 Thread Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT & Internet)
Am 13. März 2015 19:03:56 MEZ, schrieb Ryan Schmidt : >We should still try to identify which ports are using a Google Code >project as their homepage or master_sites location, see if the projects >have already moved elsewhere, and, if so, update the ports. And if not, >see if the developer has plan

Re: Death of Google Code

2015-03-13 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Mar 13, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 13, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Mark Anderson wrote: > >> Do we have any idea what we need to do/should do to prepare for the >> eventual shutdown of google code? I know a lot of stuff has been >> abandoning it, but I feel like we've got quite a f

Re: Death of Google Code

2015-03-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 13, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Mark Anderson wrote: > Do we have any idea what we need to do/should do to prepare for the eventual > shutdown of google code? I know a lot of stuff has been abandoning it, but I > feel like we've got quite a few ports out there that will be hit. Thanks, I was jus

Death of Google Code

2015-03-13 Thread Mark Anderson
Do we have any idea what we need to do/should do to prepare for the eventual shutdown of google code? I know a lot of stuff has been abandoning it, but I feel like we've got quite a few ports out there that will be hit. —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson _