On Jan 7, 2014, at 12:51, Peter Danecek wrote:
> Okay, this could be fixed for the specific port and I admit the version
> naming of the particular software is not really clean. But I am wondering if
> the default regex is really optimal? Couldn't we come up with something which
> fits more/a
Hi all,
I just stepped across a somewhat *strange* default behaviour for the livecheck
for sourceforge hosted software.
Okay, this could be fixed for the specific port and I admit the version naming
of the particular software is not really clean. But I am wondering if the
default regex is rea
On 2010-04-24 22:17 , Joseph Holsten wrote:
> I don't currently use the dev branch of macports or I would try to do
> this myself. Is there a guide to this in the wiki somewhere?
You don't need to change base for this, the livecheck is in
_resources/port1.0/livecheck/sourceforge.tcl as port of the
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> The SourceForge newsfeed has become increasingly unreliable of late and I
> hate it. :) My new favorite SourceForge livecheck is:
>
> livecheck.type regex
> livecheck.url http://sourceforge.net/projects/${name}/files/
> livecheck.regex ${name}-(\[0-9.\]+)\\.tar
[snip]
> Mayb
