Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Or change the name of the software. These restrictions apply only
in this case:
[quoted from the LICENSE file]
If the name Ion(tm) or other names that can be associated with the Ion
project are used to distribute this software, then:
[/quoted]
Seems like Debian
Interesting idea; this brings yet another possibility. The only problem
I could see with that strategy is yet-another-license-change forbidding
derivative works.
If PortMgr thinks this is the way it should be handled, we could do the
rename in the Debian fashion, but personally I won't be
On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Markus Weissmann wrote:
Hi Pierre,
thanks for bringing this up here: Mr. Valkonen's license is
absolutely unbearable.
As an alternative: Perhaps you can bring the port back to the last
sane licensed version - don't know if this is useful and/or possible.
Markus Weissmann wrote:
Hi Pierre,
thanks for bringing this up here: Mr. Valkonen's license is absolutely
unbearable.
As an alternative: Perhaps you can bring the port back to the last
sane licensed version - don't know if this is useful and/or possible.
Either that or remove it please.
[sorry for cross-posting]
Hi all,
Here are two mails T. Valkonen sent respectively to FreeBSD Ports [1]
and pkgsrc [2], warning them of a license violation on his software,
ion3 (x11/ion3).
I'll be committing a removal of the port in 5 days if nobody wants to
step up and take ownership
Pierre Queinnec wrote:
Here are two mails T. Valkonen sent respectively to FreeBSD Ports [1]
and pkgsrc [2], warning them of a license violation on his software,
ion3 (x11/ion3).
I'll be committing a removal of the port in 5 days if nobody wants to
step up and take ownership from me. Then
On Dec 13, 2007, at 16:13, paul beard wrote:
On 12/13/07, Rainer Müller wrote:
For me this sounds like a removal request... What is the problem
with a
version more than 28 days old? In my personal opinion ion3 with this
license addition does not qualify as free software any more.
