I've also looked through older port versions. None of them changes
the "python.pkgd" setting. Thus those modules will always get
installed into the site-packages directory and will not be imported.
So this means the fix is ready for checkin? Is there anything I can do?
On 16.04.2009, at 13:
I've been running the patched python25 port for over a week now and
can only confirm what Jannis said. There are no problems.
I tested the following ports:
• py25-zlib
• py25-hashlib
• py25-bsddb
• py25-sqlite3
• py25-tkinter
• py25-bz2
•
Am 15.04.2009 um 01:34 schrieb Bryan Blackburn:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:19:30PM +0200, Jannis Leidel said:
Am 14.04.2009 um 22:00 schrieb Bryan Blackburn:
[...]
As long as the one in lib-dynload is always loaded first, it
shouldn't
be
too big a deal, but someone really should test it...
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:19:30PM +0200, Jannis Leidel said:
> Am 14.04.2009 um 22:00 schrieb Bryan Blackburn:
[...]
>>
>> As long as the one in lib-dynload is always loaded first, it shouldn't
>> be
>> too big a deal, but someone really should test it...
>
> At the risk of not knowing how that c
Am 14.04.2009 um 22:00 schrieb Bryan Blackburn:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:10:32AM +0200, Arthur Koziel said:
On 13.04.2009, at 23:19, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
Right, the way the py25-* version installs it is different than if
you
install it directly with python25, that's actually part of t
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:10:32AM +0200, Arthur Koziel said:
>
> On 13.04.2009, at 23:19, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
>>
>> Right, the way the py25-* version installs it is different than if you
>> install it directly with python25, that's actually part of the problem
>> with
>> splitting them out, as
On 13.04.2009, at 23:19, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
Right, the way the py25-* version installs it is different than if you
install it directly with python25, that's actually part of the
problem with
splitting them out, as mentioned with the -S stuff on #12369:
${prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packa
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:44:33PM +0200, Rainer Müller said:
> Arthur Koziel wrote:
> > Here's how I thought of it (using hashlib as an example):
> >
> > Once the python25 port is updated, the hashlib module will be located
> > one level
> > above the "site-packages" directory. So, all "import
Arthur Koziel wrote:
> Here's how I thought of it (using hashlib as an example):
>
> Once the python25 port is updated, the hashlib module will be located
> one level
> above the "site-packages" directory. So, all "import hashlib"
> statements would
> result in importing the hashlib module ins
On 13.04.2009, at 15:11, Rainer Müller wrote:
Bryan Blackburn wrote:
It would be nice to move 2.4 and 2.5 (or at least 2.5) to the same
model as
2.6+, but that is quite a bit of work; not to update the python25
port but
to remove all the dependencies which have built up using those
module
Bryan Blackburn wrote:
> It would be nice to move 2.4 and 2.5 (or at least 2.5) to the same model as
> 2.6+, but that is quite a bit of work; not to update the python25 port but
> to remove all the dependencies which have built up using those modules that
> would no longer be needed.
The dependenc
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:46:04PM +0200, Arthur Koziel said:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing this because of ticket #12369
> [http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12369], which is 21 months old and still
> hasn't been resolved. The general problem is whether the python25 port
> should include core modules
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2009, at 15:15, Julio Biason wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
As a Python user of MacPorts, I'd prefer that those were variants.
sudo port install python26 +ssl +tk +...
>>>
>>>
On Apr 11, 2009, at 15:15, Julio Biason wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
As a Python user of MacPorts, I'd prefer that those were variants.
sudo port install python26 +ssl +tk +...
Which would mean you would have to rebuild the whole python port
unnecessarily jus
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> As a Python user of MacPorts, I'd prefer that those were variants.
>>
>> sudo port install python26 +ssl +tk +...
>
> Which would mean you would have to rebuild the whole python port
> unnecessarily just to add another module.
I know. It ju
Julio Biason wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> In my opinion, most users won't need tkinter and thus do not need to
>> install tk. As you can see from above, this is what pulls the most
>> dependencies in. So what about removing only tk from the default python
>> bu
Arthur Koziel wrote:
> The current python25 port doesn't install the core modules. It expects
> the user to install the ones he need. This leads to some confusion, as
> new users generally assume that "core modules" like hashlib should
> always be available (and a lot python script do rely on
Hello,
I'm writing this because of ticket #12369 [http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12369
], which is 21 months old and still hasn't been resolved. The general
problem is whether the python25 port should include core modules
(hashlib, sqlite3, ...) or not.
The current python25 port doesn't i
18 matches
Mail list logo
