On Sep 16, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Personally I would be in favour of +mysql5.5, +mariadb10.0 (also in
> favour of renaming the port to mysql-5.5), but then again we have a
> zillion of ports using +gcc48, +python34, +clang34 etc. If there is no
> reason not to allow the dots, i
On Sep 15, 2014, at 10:37 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Sep 15, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>>
>>> Is a dot "." a legal character in variant names?
>>
>> Oh, you're right, we have been avoiding dots in variant names. We
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>> Is a dot "." a legal character in variant names?
>
> Oh, you're right, we have been avoiding dots in variant names. We have a lint
> check that says "use [A-Za-z0-9_]+ only".
>
> Us
On Sep 15, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> Is a dot "." a legal character in variant names?
Oh, you're right, we have been avoiding dots in variant names. We have a lint
check that says "use [A-Za-z0-9_]+ only".
Using "-" in a variant name probably actually causes a problem (b
On Sep 13, 2014, at 6:23 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> We need to do some work making MySQL variant names consistent in ports and
> adding variants to ports for newer MySQL ports.
>
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39961
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44484
And thi
We need to do some work making MySQL variant names consistent in ports and
adding variants to ports for newer MySQL ports.
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39961
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44484
What should the variant names be? The ports the variants would use are:
mysql51 @5.1.72
