Indeed,
the idea is not to compete with other ports but with the normal output.
I'll remove the stars if they are not in fashion anymore (I resurrected
an old part of the Portfile).
Cheers,
Eric
Le Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:44:01 -0700,
Sterling Smith a écrit :
> Mihai,
>
> While I don’t think that
On 2015-6-27 08:44 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> However 2.4 is not ready for release for a couple reasons. First, in an
> attempt to streamline, some error messages were removed, but this means that
> when you try to install a port but a conflicting port is already installed,
> you get no error me
On 27.06.2015 12:59 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> That's because they are using ui_msg... because there's no easy way of using
>> the
>> notes feature within base.
>
> And why not?
[inappropriate response here]
I don't know exactly. I've been asking you and Clemens the same question and you
On Jun 26, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> On 27.06.2015 12:04 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> I believe the instructions for activating startupitems are also printed
>> inline.
>
> That's because they are using ui_msg... because there's no easy way of using
> the
> notes feature wi
On Jun 26, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> On 27.06.2015 12:04 AM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>> On June 26, 2015 11:46:51 PM GMT+02:00, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>>> On 26.06.2015 11:44 PM, Sterling Smith wrote:
Presumably the port dependencies that need to be installed are stored
and it
On 27.06.2015 12:04 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> I believe the instructions for activating startupitems are also printed
> inline.
That's because they are using ui_msg... because there's no easy way of using the
notes feature within base.
We'd have to reimplement it using callbacks or somethi
On Jun 26, 2015, at 3:04PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
> On June 26, 2015 11:46:51 PM GMT+02:00, Mihai Moldovan
> wrote:
>> On 26.06.2015 11:44 PM, Sterling Smith wrote:
>>> Presumably the port dependencies that need to be installed are stored
>> and it would be nice if at the end of a `port install
On 27.06.2015 12:04 AM, Clemens Lang wrote:
> On June 26, 2015 11:46:51 PM GMT+02:00, Mihai Moldovan
> wrote:
>> On 26.06.2015 11:44 PM, Sterling Smith wrote:
>>> Presumably the port dependencies that need to be installed are stored
>>> and it would be nice if at the end of a `port install `, the
On June 26, 2015 11:46:51 PM GMT+02:00, Mihai Moldovan
wrote:
>On 26.06.2015 11:44 PM, Sterling Smith wrote:
>> Presumably the port dependencies that need to be installed are stored
>and it would be nice if at the end of a `port install `, there
>was a listing of the notes of the ports that were
On Jun 26, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> Isn't current base echoing all accumulated port notes at the end of completing
> its command?
>
> I know trunk does and had the impression base does, too.
AFAIK, this is not in the 2.3.3 release.
> Thus, this is only a problem iff a port use
Btw, your host just rejected my message due to being on a FusionRBL blacklist...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports
On 26.06.2015 11:44 PM, Sterling Smith wrote:
> While I don’t think that the notes of any port are more important than any
> other port, there is a problem seeing the notes as they fly by in the barrage
> of output as a given port with all of its dependencies is installed.
>
> There was a thread
Mihai,
While I don’t think that the notes of any port are more important than any
other port, there is a problem seeing the notes as they fly by in the barrage
of output as a given port with all of its dependencies is installed.
There was a thread in the past about how to get notes to stand out
Hi Eric
Please do not append or prepend stars or anything else to "attract attention" to
notes.
Notes of a specific port are not more or less important than of any other port.
Mihai
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
macports
14 matches
Mail list logo
