On May 26, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
>Can you elaborate on your comments about using makefile over xinstall?
The portfile has a custom destroot section. Look at what is between
'destroot { }' Normally this is not required and mp simply does a 'make
install' by default. Not sure if
On May 26, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
That means, to me, that 2.6 is all new features. That being the
case, it may not be possible to gracefully go from 2.5 to 2.6, I
will have to look into it.
My non-macports managed postfix install has been fine from 2.4 - 2.6
(without having
On May 25, 2009, at 8:12 PM, ma...@macports.org wrote:
Current postfix @2.5.5 Postfix is at 2.6 stable. I am not sure going
to 2.6 from the 2.5.5 is best, perhaps make a new port, as it may
have
changed significantly, to where an upgrade one would break a lot. At
the very least, we can do 2.
>Current postfix @2.5.5 Postfix is at 2.6 stable. I am not sure going
>to 2.6 from the 2.5.5 is best, perhaps make a new port, as it may have
>changed significantly, to where an upgrade one would break a lot. At
>the very least, we can do 2.5.7, which has significant updates and is
>I believe,
On 2009-5-24 11:17, Scott Haneda wrote:
> On May 23, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> Committed in r51390.
>
> Thanks. When they are committed, does that mean I have access to them,
> selfupdate would pick them up, or is there some waiting time?
Up to about 30 minutes before it hits rsy
On May 23, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2009-05-24 01:56, Scott Haneda wrote:
From the users list:
Hello, can someone closer to these two ports give me an idea of what
their status is?
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17709
No patch has been attached. Could you please attach it a
On 2009-05-24 01:56, Scott Haneda wrote:
> From the users list:
>> Hello, can someone closer to these two ports give me an idea of what
>> their status is?
>> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17709
No patch has been attached. Could you please attach it as it sounds you
are already using it?
>>
Starting to get the feeling someone does not like these two port
files, if that is the case, please let me know...
I posted this to the users list, and have been updating the trac
comments as well:
From the users list:
Hello, can someone closer to these two ports give me an idea of what
t
