Re: Promoting maven3 to 3.1.1

2013-11-26 Thread Joshua Root
On 2013-11-26 19:20 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Nov 26, 2013, at 00:06, Mark Evenson wrote: > >> Other than I don’t know any other example of a port name with a period (“.”) >> in it, so we might want to check that including version in this way doesn’t >> break anything, this looks like a perf

Re: Promoting maven3 to 3.1.1

2013-11-26 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 26, 2013, at 00:06, Mark Evenson wrote: > Other than I don’t know any other example of a port name with a period (“.”) > in it, so we might want to check that including version in this way doesn’t > break anything, this looks like a perfectly acceptable proposal to me. perl5.12, p5.12-*

Re: Promoting maven3 to 3.1.1

2013-11-26 Thread Mark Evenson
Good: possible objection retracted. Blair Zajac wrote: >On Nov 25, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Mark Evenson wrote: > >> Other than I don’t know any other example of a port name with a period (“.”) >> in it, so we might want to check that including version in this way doesn’t >> break anything, this lo

Re: Promoting maven3 to 3.1.1

2013-11-25 Thread Blair Zajac
On Nov 25, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Mark Evenson wrote: > Other than I don’t know any other example of a port name with a period (“.”) > in it, so we might want to check that including version in this way doesn’t > break anything, this looks like a perfectly acceptable proposal to me. The scala2.* p

Re: Promoting maven3 to 3.1.1

2013-11-25 Thread Mark Evenson
On Nov 24, 2013, at 22:38, Blair Zajac wrote: > > On Nov 24, 2013, at 3:30 AM, Mark Evenson wrote: > >> >> On Nov 23, 2013, at 9:20, Blair Zajac wrote: […] >>> Any reason for me not to update the maven3 port to 3.1.1? >> >> Maven 3.1 is significantly different “under the hood” than Maven

Re: Promoting maven3 to 3.1.1

2013-11-24 Thread Blair Zajac
On Nov 24, 2013, at 3:30 AM, Mark Evenson wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2013, at 9:20, Blair Zajac wrote: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> Any reason for me not to update the maven3 port to 3.1.1? > > Maven 3.1 is significantly different “under the hood” than Maven 3.0, > especially in the adoption of the apac

Re: Promoting maven3 to 3.1.1

2013-11-24 Thread Mark Evenson
On Nov 23, 2013, at 9:20, Blair Zajac wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Any reason for me not to update the maven3 port to 3.1.1? Maven 3.1 is significantly different “under the hood” than Maven 3.0, especially in the adoption of the apache.org Aether connector. This affected me with ABCL’s usage in th