Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-21 Thread MK-MacPorts
On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:01 PM, Michael Dickens wrote: > So, long story to get to the reasons of the change; I hope that all > makes sense. I will take a look at your ticket's issue & see what I can > figure out. - MLD Thanks, Michael, for your detailed explanations! :) I hope you can figure out w

Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-21 Thread Michael Dickens
On Sep 21, 2012, at 1:47 PM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote: > please fill me in - since I'm not an expert of MacOSX-specific development - > I have a question: > What is the reason for this Framework stuff? Why did you move from lib to > Library/Frameworks? > This ticket shows the trouble I ran int

Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-21 Thread MK-MacPorts
Hi Michael, please fill me in - since I'm not an expert of MacOSX-specific development - I have a question: What is the reason for this Framework stuff? Why did you move from lib to Library/Frameworks? This ticket shows the trouble I ran into due to the move to frameworks: https://tra

Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Dickens
On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > As for moving to a framework-always install, that seems like a good idea to > me. If there are a few ports that have problems with it hopefully they can be > patched. Well, the internals would be compiled as frameworks, and when QMake is execu

Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-19 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 19, 2012, at 16:48, Frank Schima wrote: > Ideally actually would be to move the +examples and +demos variants into > sub-ports - qt4-mac-examples and qt4-mac-demos. I was going to suggest the same but you beat me to it! As for moving to a framework-always install, that seems like a goo

Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-19 Thread Frank Schima
On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:30 AM, Michael Dickens wrote: > On Sep 19, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Craig Treleaven > wrote: >> Appreciate all the effort you have and continue to put into making Qt as >> painless as possible! > > Thanks! And, that's the goal: as painless as possible. qt4-mac is a BIG > com

Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-19 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Michael Dickens wrote: > After some thinking about the amount of effort I've put into relocating > Qt's frameworks from ${prefix}/lib to ${prefix}/Library/Frameworks, and > how much more will need to be done -- e.g., for CMake, and pretty much > any CMake-using port t

Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-19 Thread Michael Dickens
On Sep 19, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Craig Treleaven wrote: > Appreciate all the effort you have and continue to put into making Qt as > painless as possible! Thanks! And, that's the goal: as painless as possible. qt4-mac is a BIG compile, so I try hard to avoid requiring a recompile any more often th

Re: Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-19 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 11:44 AM -0400 9/19/12, Michael Dickens wrote: After some thinking about the amount of effort I've put into relocating Qt's frameworks from ${prefix}/lib to ${prefix}/Library/Frameworks, and how much more will need to be done -- e.g., for CMake, and pretty much any CMake-using port that tries

Qt4 as both framework and library

2012-09-19 Thread Michael Dickens
After some thinking about the amount of effort I've put into relocating Qt's frameworks from ${prefix}/lib to ${prefix}/Library/Frameworks, and how much more will need to be done -- e.g., for CMake, and pretty much any CMake-using port that tries to find Qt4, to work reliably when trying to find "q