On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:36:26PM -0800, Dan Ports wrote:
Just about every perl port runs into this one. We probably want to have
them either install manpages into separate directories or include a
version in the name. (I think the former is better if we can get the
manpath set up correctly,
I think it's high (well past, very much so, etc.) time
to move perl5 to perl5.14. If anyone has a reason *not* to
do so, please let me know by the end of this week (20Jan2012).
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 07:35:10PM +, Eric Hall wrote:
I think it's high (well past, very much so, etc.) time
to move perl5 to perl5.14. If anyone has a reason *not* to
do so, please let me know by the end of this week (20Jan2012).
I certainly don't object to the idea, but I'm
On Jan 16, 2012, at 17:42, Dan Ports wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 07:35:10PM +, Eric Hall wrote:
I think it's high (well past, very much so, etc.) time
to move perl5 to perl5.14. If anyone has a reason *not* to
do so, please let me know by the end of this week (20Jan2012).
I
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:48:36PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 16, 2012, at 17:42, Dan Ports wrote:
If so, we're in
trouble, because most p5.12-* ports conflict with their p5.14-*
counterparts.
They should not conflict. That's the whole reason they're subports. Which
ones
