Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Having to specify "-ssl +gnutls" is stupid. The way I see it, "ssl" and
"gnutls" are two radio buttons. To select the radio button you want, you
shouldn't also have to manually deselect the radio button you don't
want. It should be automatic. Fixed the lynx port so it behave
N_Ox wrote:
These two sugar syntaxes would make the variant writing process cleaner.
But maybe they could help us more...
Let's say the variants which do something only when they are disabled
(variant -some_variant) are always enabled by default.
In this setup, `sudo port install some_port +ano
Le 4 févr. 08 à 18:32, Ryan Schmidt a écrit :
On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:13, Rainer Müller wrote:
So how would I tell that a +variant is default? E.g. the lynx port
provides support for OpenSSL (+ssl) and GNU TLS (+gnutls). They
are conflicting variants, with +ssl in default_variants. But the
On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:23 AM, N_Ox wrote:
[ ... description of new variant syntax ...]
First, let me just say how happy I am to see people revisiting the
topic of variants and how to better express them. I think variants
are one of the more powerful features of MacPorts (that no other por
Le 4 févr. 08 à 18:13, Rainer Müller a écrit :
N_Ox wrote:
These two sugar syntaxes would make the variant writing process
cleaner.
But maybe they could help us more...
Let's say the variants which do something only when they are
disabled (variant -some_variant) are always enabled by defau
On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:13, Rainer Müller wrote:
So how would I tell that a +variant is default? E.g. the lynx port
provides support for OpenSSL (+ssl) and GNU TLS (+gnutls). They are
conflicting variants, with +ssl in default_variants. But the user
has the choice to install it with GNU TLS b
On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:46, Rainer Müller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Having to specify "-ssl +gnutls" is stupid. The way I see it,
"ssl" and "gnutls" are two radio buttons. To select the radio
button you want, you shouldn't also have to manually deselect the
radio button you don't want. It
2008/2/4, N_Ox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Le 4 févr. 08 à 18:13, Rainer Müller a écrit :
>
> > N_Ox wrote:
> >> These two sugar syntaxes would make the variant writing process
> >> cleaner.
> >> But maybe they could help us more...
> >> Let's say the variants which do something only when they are
> >
Thomas de Grivel wrote:
I like it. If there is some kind of poll here, I'm in =)
Hm, I don't think we found final options for a voting yet, do we?
Rainer
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/m
