Review request for PR ...

2017-05-07 Thread Peter Danecek
Hi devels, I submitted one enhancement to a port I maintain as PR in order to get your opinion: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/434 Thanks for your feedback. ~petr ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.or

Review request for new-port ticket #50421 (wallet @1.3)

2016-10-27 Thread A. Karl Kornel
Good morning! Would someone mind checking out ticket #50421? This is a new port submission I posted a while ago, but it hasn't been acted on. There are a number of patches, but they have been accepted upstream, so when the next release happens the number of patches should be much lower (assumi

Re: port:gpgme / Fwd: Review Request 129265: Port from KF5Gpgme to GpgME

2016-10-27 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Thursday October 27 2016 12:05:33 Rainer Müller wrote: > Once again, our Trac is not hosted by GitHub. I know, but logging in does involve github as far as I can tell. I restarted my login session, so I have to log in again. R. ___ macports-dev mai

Re: port:gpgme / Fwd: Review Request 129265: Port from KF5Gpgme to GpgME

2016-10-27 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2016-10-27 09:58, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I'm not getting into trac (github being DDoS'ed again??), so I'm forwarding > this info via the ML hoping Ryan will catch it. Once again, our Trac is not hosted by GitHub. This is still the same cause Clemens reported on yesterday. Please bear with

port:gpgme / Fwd: Review Request 129265: Port from KF5Gpgme to GpgME

2016-10-27 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hi, I'm not getting into trac (github being DDoS'ed again??), so I'm forwarding this info via the ML hoping Ryan will catch it. First, gpgme has been updated to 1.7.1 which apparently brings bug fixes we "definitely want". But more importantly, KDE is dropping the use of its own version of gpg

Re: Review request for tickets #52545, #52590, #52615

2016-10-17 Thread David Evans
On 10/17/16 6:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 7:55 PM, David Evans wrote: >> >> On 10/17/16 2:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:43 PM, David Evans wrote: Ryan, I'm trying to commit as many pending svn commits as soon as possible in

Re: Review request for tickets #52545, #52590, #52615

2016-10-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 7:55 PM, David Evans wrote: > > On 10/17/16 2:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:43 PM, David Evans wrote: >>> >>> Ryan, >>> >>> I'm trying to commit as many pending svn commits as soon as possible in >>> anticipation of the migration to git. I'd

Re: Review request for tickets #52545, #52590, #52615

2016-10-17 Thread David Evans
On 10/17/16 2:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:43 PM, David Evans wrote: >> >> Ryan, >> >> I'm trying to commit as many pending svn commits as soon as possible in >> anticipation of the migration to git. I'd >> appreciate it if you could look at these 3 tickets[1][2][3] and

Re: Review request for tickets #52545, #52590, #52615

2016-10-17 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:43 PM, David Evans wrote: > > Ryan, > > I'm trying to commit as many pending svn commits as soon as possible in > anticipation of the migration to git. I'd > appreciate it if you could look at these 3 tickets[1][2][3] and let me know > if you agree they can be committ

Review request for tickets #52545, #52590, #52615

2016-10-17 Thread David Evans
Ryan, I'm trying to commit as many pending svn commits as soon as possible in anticipation of the migration to git. I'd appreciate it if you could look at these 3 tickets[1][2][3] and let me know if you agree they can be committed as is, or if you have any suggestions for their improvement. Th

review request -- sshuttle https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52198

2016-10-12 Thread Ken Cunningham
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52198 I think this port has reached a point where a review would be a reasonable ask. It was a requested port I filled -- a very useful piece of software for me. Helps you access a network behind a router with only ssh access to one machine. Nicely fills a need

Ticket review request

2016-10-10 Thread Sterling Smith
MacPorts Committers, Please review/test/commit https://trac.macports.org/ticket/47941. Thanks, Sterling PS Looking forward to GitHub Pull Requests... ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/l

review request - hatari 1.9 fix for snow leopard without xcode 4.2

2016-10-07 Thread Ken Cunningham Webuse
I think this does it. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52537 Thanks! Ken ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Review request (#51448)

2016-08-24 Thread coquelleni
Hello, Could someone review (and commit) ticket #51448 ? https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51448 Thanks in advance. Nico. ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Review request: Java-related ports

2016-07-04 Thread Aaron Madlon-Kay
Hi all. I have the following tickets ready for review: New port: kotlin (2 weeks old) https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51576 jython: update to 2.7.0 (2 weeks old) https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51682 If someone could take a look that would be great. Thanks, Aaron

Review Request: Calculix and netgen

2016-04-18 Thread Ian Rees
Hi All, Mark Brethen and I have put some work into the new port for calculix and modifications to netgen - would really appreciate it if we could get these reviewed and merged in! calculix: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50810 netgen: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50687 Thanks! -Ian-

Port review request #51086 (borgbackup)

2016-04-14 Thread Björn Ketelaars
Hello, I recently submitted a port for borgackup at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51086. Can I somehow help in the review process of this submission? Kind regards, -- Björn Ketelaars GPG key: 0x4F0E5F21 ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@li

New port review request: calculix

2016-03-18 Thread Ian Rees
Hello, Just wondering if there's anything I can do to help my new calculix Port request at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50810 move along? Thanks! -Ian- ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.or

Review Request

2016-02-12 Thread Casey Rodarmor
Hi there, May I request a review of https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50580? Thanks! Best, Casey ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Re: Review Request

2016-02-07 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > gmail calendar support gone wonky, look like. I get that calendar link from > the original message, but the quoted one in Bradley's message is correct. Yeah, sorry about that, something must have gone wrong when I copied the link from my

Re: Review Request

2016-02-07 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 3:00 PM, David Evans wrote: > Same here. New form of spam? gmail calendar support gone wonky, look like. I get that calendar link from the original message, but the quoted one in Bradley's message is correct. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sin

Re: Review Request

2016-02-07 Thread David Evans
On 2/7/16 11:48 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >> On Feb 6, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Casey Rodarmor wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> May I request a review of https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50540? It's a >> pretty simple new port. > > Oddly, in my email client the above url is a link to > https://www.go

Re: Review Request

2016-02-07 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Casey Rodarmor wrote: > > Hi there, > > May I request a review of https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50540? It's a > pretty simple new port. Oddly, in my email client the above url is a link to https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=czZ1bmFxYmVkaWRr

Review Request

2016-02-06 Thread Casey Rodarmor
Hi there, May I request a review of https://trac.macports.org/ticket/50540 ? It's a pretty simple new port. Thanks! Best, Casey ___ macp

MacPorts Portfile submission review request: qbs

2015-04-24 Thread Jake Petroules
Hello, I recently submitted a new Portfile for inclusion of the Qt Build Suite (Qbs) into MacPorts: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/47502 . As it's been a few days, following the guidelines on the MacPorts website, I'd like to request a review of this s

Re: base: improve livecheck.type moddate (review request)

2014-09-12 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
On Sep 12, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2014-9-12 14:31 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >> MacPorts Devs, >> >> >> I am seeking comments on the patches [1][2] to port livecheck in ticket >> 44894 [3]. >> >> In curl.c, the getmoddate function is copied from the isnewer function with

Re: base: improve livecheck.type moddate (review request)

2014-09-12 Thread Joshua Root
On 2014-9-12 14:31 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > MacPorts Devs, > > > I am seeking comments on the patches [1][2] to port livecheck in ticket 44894 > [3]. > > In curl.c, the getmoddate function is copied from the isnewer function with > minor changes to return the remote file moddate. > > In

base: improve livecheck.type moddate (review request)

2014-09-11 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
MacPorts Devs, I am seeking comments on the patches [1][2] to port livecheck in ticket 44894 [3]. In curl.c, the getmoddate function is copied from the isnewer function with minor changes to return the remote file moddate. In portfilecheck.tcl, I have add a "livecheck.type moddate2" for testi

GStreamer 1.2.1 Update Review Request

2013-11-24 Thread Dominik Röttsches
Hi, could someone review/merge the gstreamer 1.0 -> 1.2.1 update? https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40710 Haven’t heard from the other contributors on that ticket for a while - Thanks! Dominik___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge

[GSoC] Application review request

2011-04-04 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi, I just applied for the rev-upgrade proposal in GSoC and would welcome any feedback to my application, which can be found at http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/neverpanic/1 I will probably be also applying for a different proposal as soon as I have some

Peer review request: changes to portutil.tcl

2010-01-28 Thread Ryan Schmidt
Could I get another pair of eyes to review my proposed changes? http://trac.macports.org/ticket/23456 I'm changing a fundamental function in MacPorts base, with the intended result that arguments should retain any quoting. It seems to work for me for the case I'm interested in at the moment, bu