On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:02:37PM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> Probably the only reason is that no one implemented it yet (and maybe you are
> the first person to notice that it's an issue).
>
> I imagine a patch to improve this behavior would get committed eagerly :)
I was actually asking if
On Nov 5, 2010, at 11:02, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Dan Ports wrote:
>>
>> I see that mportdepends stops searching recursively when it hits a port
>> that's already installed. Any reason it can't do the same when it hits
>> an uninstalled dependency it's already seen?
>
On Nov 4, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Dan Ports wrote:
>
> I see that mportdepends stops searching recursively when it hits a port
> that's already installed. Any reason it can't do the same when it hits
> an uninstalled dependency it's already seen?
Probably the only reason is that no one implemented it y
Today I tried doing a `port install texlive +full` on a system with no
ports installed -- and came to regret this, as it spent the better part
of an hour computing dependencies.
I looked through the 140M debug log, and it looks like _mportispresent
is being called over a million times. That's pret
