Re: Time for 1.9

2010-05-06 Thread Rainer Müller
On 06.05.2010 11:42, Russell Jones wrote: > Authorization and authentication. The thing about "deps" is that it's > ambiguous (could be dependencies or dependants). Perhaps it should be > expanded to dependencies in light of the facility allowing arguments > to be the minimal unambiguous string, wh

RE: Time for 1.9

2010-05-06 Thread Russell Jones
Authorization and authentication. The thing about "deps" is that it's ambiguous (could be dependencies or dependants). Perhaps it should be expanded to dependencies in light of the facility allowing arguments to be the minimal unambiguous string, which I guess would make them depende and dependa

Re: Time for 1.9

2010-05-05 Thread Steve Allen
Russell Jones wrote: > Andrea D'Amore wrote: > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > > >> The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive' (or the > >> abbreviated version 'deps --r'). But I guess that only bothers me, so > >> just leave it as it is now :-)

Re: Time for 1.9

2010-05-05 Thread Russell Jones
Andrea D'Amore wrote: On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive' (or the abbreviated version 'deps --r'). But I guess that only bothers me, so just leave it as it is now :-) Meaning that in trunk it actually os '

Re: Time for 1.9

2010-05-03 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-5-4 16:51 , Andrea D'Amore wrote: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: >> The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive' (or the >> abbreviated version 'deps --r'). But I guess that only bothers me, so >> just leave it as it is now :-) > > Meaning that in

Re: Time for 1.9

2010-05-03 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive' (or the > abbreviated version 'deps --r'). But I guess that only bothers me, so > just leave it as it is now :-) Meaning that in trunk it actually os 'rdeps' but you'd like 'deps

rdeps vs deps --r (was: Re: Time for 1.9)

2010-05-03 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-5-3 20:09 , Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2010-05-03 00:18 , Joshua Root wrote: >> The milestone is now empty. Does anyone have anything really important >> they'd like to commit before we branch and build a beta? > > The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive' (or the > abbr

Re: Time for 1.9

2010-05-03 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2010-05-03 00:18 , Joshua Root wrote: > The milestone is now empty. Does anyone have anything really important > they'd like to commit before we branch and build a beta? The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive' (or the abbreviated version 'deps --r'). But I guess that only

Time for 1.9

2010-05-02 Thread Joshua Root
The milestone is now empty. Does anyone have anything really important they'd like to commit before we branch and build a beta? - Josh ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macpor