On Mar 16, 2014, at 17:18, Rainer Müller wrote:
> a) No support for svn:ignore property
>
> Easy to accomplish, we would just keep the equivalent in .gitignore
> and .hgignore files in the repository root. The svn:ignore property
> would still be the authoritative value. As these are barely se
Hi,
I'd like to chime in and offer my $.02. I'll try to keep it brief though,
because nobody wants to read thousands of large opinionated posts in this
thread if it's supposed to go somewhere.
I think the popularity gives git the clear advantage over mercurial or any of
the other systems. Also
On 2014-03-16 19:42, Sean Farley wrote:
> If MacPorts really wants to switch to distributed version control, then
> I would suggest Mercurial. I have experimented with using Mercurial for
> the MacPorts repo and found that the mercurial UI is much, much more
> consistent than git coming from Subver
