Joshua Root wrote:
>> Everything else aside, this seems to be good impetus to provide binary
>> packages.
>
> Lack of a good reason has never been what stopped this from happening...
Did you want to start including @pkgdep and the pkg command ?
Or was there every any further plans to use "real
On 2011-3-12 03:43 , Landon J Fuller wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:16 PM, James Berry wrote:
>
>> In summary, not much has changed as-of yet: Xcode 3 is still available and
>> free; what the future holds is somewhat less certain. I encourage MacPorts
>> developers and users who want to influ
Landon J Fuller wrote:
>> In summary, not much has changed as-of yet: Xcode 3 is still available and
>> free; what the future holds is somewhat less certain. I encourage MacPorts
>> developers and users who want to influence that future to make their wishes
>> known to any Apple contacts you mi
On Mar 11, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Landon J Fuller wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:16 PM, James Berry wrote:
>
>> In summary, not much has changed as-of yet: Xcode 3 is still available and
>> free; what the future holds is somewhat less certain. I encourage MacPorts
>> developers and users who wa
On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:16 PM, James Berry wrote:
> In summary, not much has changed as-of yet: Xcode 3 is still available and
> free; what the future holds is somewhat less certain. I encourage MacPorts
> developers and users who want to influence that future to make their wishes
> known to any
Sorry for the cross-post, but as this issue has been on both the users and the
dev lists, I'm posting to both.
I know that there's a lot of concern about the cost of Xcode 4, as well as of
some compatibility issues. I know the portmgr team has been thinking about
this, and has passed on some of
