6-2 on
>>> Ubuntu's launchpad was posted 2012-10-18? Sourceforge seems like the
>>> canonical(ha!) source.
>>
>> Looking at this page:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/c2html/files/c2html/
>>
>> I would say that Sourceforge is calculati
rge seems like the canonical(ha!)
>> source.
>
> Looking at this page:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/c2html/files/c2html/
>
> I would say that Sourceforge is calculating the date incorrectly.
I downloaded the archive labeled 0.9.6-3 (raring) and all the version
references
launchpad seems more or less
>> actively developed.
>
> It says on Sourceforge that 1.1.0 was posted 2013-03-11, 0.9.6-2 on Ubuntu's
> launchpad was posted 2012-10-18? Sourceforge seems like the canonical(ha!)
> source.
Looking at this page:
http://sourceforge.net/project
On 25 mar 2013, at 22:08, Sean Farley wrote:
> I have a project that depends on the newer one located at launchpad but
> the versioning confuses me. The one at sourceforge hasn't been updated
> for at least four years while the one at launchpad seems more or less
> actively developed.
It says on
Hi all,
I am confused as to what the difference is between the c2html version
at:
http://c2html.sourceforge.net
and
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/c2html
I have a project that depends on the newer one located at launchpad but
the versioning confuses me. The one at sourceforge hasn&#
