I noticed that installing clang-3.6 requires also installation of llvm-3.5
because dependency ld64 selects it as the default variant.
Confusing, but there might be a reason for that...
Well, is it recommended to rather use version 3.5 ATM?
___
macports
On Sep 10, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Marko Käning mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
I noticed that installing clang-3.6 requires also installation of llvm-3.5
because dependency ld64 selects it as the default variant.
ld64 and cctools use LLVM for libLTO and llvm-mc.
Confusing, but there might
know people like seeing final
version numbers instead of scary svn revisions ;)
--Jeremy
On Sep 10, 2014, at 13:34, Lawrence Velázquez lar...@macports.org wrote:
On Sep 10, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Marko Käning mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
I noticed that installing clang-3.6 requires also
On 10 Sep 2014, at 22:34 , Lawrence Velázquez lar...@macports.org wrote:
LLVM 3.5 was released a few days ago (although Jeremy hasn't bumped the port
to the release version yet), while 3.6 is still very much in development.
Oh, I see…
Good to know, thanks.
On 10 Sep 2014, at 22:46 , Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jerem...@macports.org
wrote:
ld64 supports a variant to use llvm-3.6 for LTO by default, so you may prefer
to set that.
Yeah, I saw that and switched to that one.
Yes, llvm-3.5 hasn't been bumped to the final release, but it is pulling
