Citando Simon Ruderich :
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:00:52PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > Please, no. It was that way in MacPorts 1.5.1, and we had to quickly
> > release
> > 1.5.2 to make it non-fatal due to all the reports coming in. I still see
> > reports coming in every once in awhil
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:00:52PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Please, no. It was that way in MacPorts 1.5.1, and we had to quickly release
> 1.5.2 to make it non-fatal due to all the reports coming in. I still see
> reports coming in every once in awhile about ports violating the mtree
> wit
On Dec 17, 2007, at 13:50, Simon Ruderich wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:05:40PM +0100, Markus Weissmann wrote:
Perhaps we should make those fatal again and add an option to port
(1) for
ignoring warnings, like `port --I-know-what-Im-doing install foo'.
I think it's okay to make it fata
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:05:40PM +0100, Markus Weissmann wrote:
>
> "This is not really a warning" (quote from the Changeset)
>
> Well, actually it is. This indicates that the software that will just be
> installed does not meet our 'mtree' requirements *).
> Think of it more like a warning of a
On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Markus Weissmann wrote:
Perhaps we should make those fatal again and add an option to
port(1) for ignoring warnings, like `port --I-know-what-Im-doing
install foo'.
I don't think that would be good (as apache module ports, for example,
violate the mtree but do
On Dec 17, 2007, at 5:47 PM, Simon Ruderich wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 04:22:48AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
This is normal. The port does request to install files outside of
the common
directory structure. That's what you've indicated by adding
"destroot.violate_mtree" to the portfile.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 04:22:48AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> This is normal. The port does request to install files outside of the common
> directory structure. That's what you've indicated by adding
> "destroot.violate_mtree" to the portfile. port is simply informing the user
> of this, be
On Dec 16, 2007, at 10:54, Simon Ruderich wrote:
I updated the ntfs-3g and added destroot.violate_mtree yes because
it installs
a file into /sbin (which is necessary).
Now a user reported to me he gets the following warning during
install:
---> Fetching ntfs-3g
---> Verifying checksum(
Hi,
I updated the ntfs-3g and added destroot.violate_mtree yes because it installs
a file into /sbin (which is necessary).
Now a user reported to me he gets the following warning during install:
---> Fetching ntfs-3g
---> Verifying checksum(s) for ntfs-3g
---> Extracting ntfs-3g
---> Configu
