Re: doc and doc-new in svn

2015-04-09 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2015-04-08 16:56, Joshua Root wrote: On 2015-4-9 00:30 , Eitan Adler wrote: In this post it says that the old doc tree will be reviewed and removed soon. In 2008. https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2008-June/005432.html Is there any reason to keep the old doc tree

doc and doc-new in svn

2015-04-08 Thread Eitan Adler
Hi, In this post it says that the old doc tree will be reviewed and removed soon. In 2008. https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2008-June/005432.html Is there any reason to keep the old doc tree around? -- Eitan Adler ___ macports-dev

Re: doc and doc-new in svn

2015-04-08 Thread Joshua Root
On 2015-4-9 00:30 , Eitan Adler wrote: Hi, In this post it says that the old doc tree will be reviewed and removed soon. In 2008. https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2008-June/005432.html Is there any reason to keep the old doc tree around? The reviewing part, to check

Re: doc and doc-new in svn

2015-04-08 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Well, it will be reviewed soon. On Apr 8, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: Is there any reason to keep the old doc tree around? ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org

Re: doc and doc-new in svn

2008-06-19 Thread markd
Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in use anylonger? I would say yes. As you can see in the repository browser [1] doc hasn't gotten any commits in 9 months, which is when doc-new was created. so should we maybe get rid of it? +1, removes confusion and

Re: doc and doc-new in svn

2008-06-19 Thread Caspar Florian Ebeling
Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in use anylonger? I would say yes. As you can see in the repository browser [1] doc hasn't gotten any commits in 9 months, which is when doc-new was created. so should we maybe get rid of it? +1, removes confusion and

Re: doc and doc-new in svn

2008-06-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 15, 2008, at 5:45 AM, Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote: Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in use anylonger? I would say yes. As you can see in the repository browser [1] doc hasn't gotten any commits in 9 months, which is when doc-new was created. [1]

Re: doc and doc-new in svn

2008-06-18 Thread Caspar Florian Ebeling
Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in use anylonger? I would say yes. As you can see in the repository browser [1] doc hasn't gotten any commits in 9 months, which is when doc-new was created. so should we maybe get rid of it? -- Florian Ebeling [EMAIL

Re: doc and doc-new in svn

2008-06-18 Thread Rainer Müller
Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote: Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in use anylonger? I would say yes. As you can see in the repository browser [1] doc hasn't gotten any commits in 9 months, which is when doc-new was created. so should we maybe get rid of it?

doc and doc-new in svn

2008-06-15 Thread Caspar Florian Ebeling
Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in use anylonger? Florian -- Florian Ebeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org