Bringing this discussion to macports-dev as suggested. Anyways,
r117621https://trac.macports.org/changeset/117621 removed
a bunch of flags from the configure script in base, many of which I found
useful. Personally, I generally prefer giving users more configure options
rather than fewer, as I
On 2014-3-8 07:13 , Eric Gallager wrote:
Bringing this discussion to macports-dev as suggested. Anyways, r117621
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/117621 removed a bunch of flags
from the configure script in base, many of which I found useful.
Personally, I generally prefer giving users more
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
On 2014-3-8 07:13 , Eric Gallager wrote:
Bringing this discussion to macports-dev as suggested. Anyways, r117621
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/117621 removed a bunch of flags
from the configure script in base, many
From the article:
Being called an inclusionist or deletionist can sidetrack the issue from the
actual debate,[21]”
On Mar 7, 2014, at 17:06, Eric Gallager eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia
On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Eric Gallager eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
libtasn1 is not actually something that gnutls maintains themselves, they
only vendor it in as a convenience. Bringing it back to MacPorts, the copy of
Tcl that is vendored in is more like libtasn1 in gnutls, in that
Hi,
Many other software packages include other software packages as part of their
base, and the general trend is to only use the included one as a fallback
in case one is not already installed. For example I was working with the
sources of gnutls earlier today and they only fall back to using
