gmtl port file

2007-01-03 Thread Doug McCorkle
Hello, I have a port file for gmtl that I would like considered for addition to macports. Please let me know if the file needs to be updated in some manner to be included. Thanks for the consideration. Doug Portfile Description: Binary data __

Re: gmtl port file

2007-01-06 Thread Doug McCorkle
On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:48 PM, Doug McCorkle wrote: Hello, I have a port file for gmtl that I would like considered for addition to macports. Please let me know if the file needs to be updated in some manner to be included. Thanks for the consideration. Were there any thoughts on this

Re: gmtl port file

2007-01-08 Thread Mark Duling
Doug McCorkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wednesday, January 3, 2007 at 6:48 PM -0800 wrote: > I have a port file for gmtl that I would like considered for >addition to macports. Please let me know if the file needs to be >updated in some manner to be included. Thanks for the consideration. Do

Re: gmtl port file

2007-01-09 Thread Doug McCorkle
On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Mark Duling wrote: Doug McCorkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wednesday, January 3, 2007 at 6:48 PM -0800 wrote: I have a port file for gmtl that I would like considered for addition to macports. Please let me know if the file needs to be updated in some manner to

Re: gmtl port file

2007-01-13 Thread Doug McCorkle
I have uploaded a new portfile that looks at the new sourceforge server. Could this ticket be reviewed: http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/11232 I did not find a way to disable looking for cppunit or boost. Doug On Jan 9, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Doug McCorkle wrote: On Jan 8, 2

Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-18 Thread Doug McCorkle
Can this ticket be reviewed? Thanks. http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/11232 Doug On Jan 13, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Doug McCorkle wrote: I have uploaded a new portfile that looks at the new sourceforge server. Could this ticket be reviewed: http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/

Re: Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-18 Thread Cédric Luthi
On 19 janv. 07, at 00:39, Doug McCorkle wrote: Can this ticket be reviewed? Thanks. http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/11232 Just so that you know, the convention is to use master_sitessourceforge:ggt instead of master_siteshttp://downloads.sourceforge.net/sou

Re: Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-19 Thread Mark Duling
Doug McCorkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 3:39 PM -0800 wrote: >Can this ticket be reviewed? Thanks. > > >[ http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/11232 >]http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/11232 It's committed now. Thanks for contributing.

Re: Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-19 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Cédric Luthi wrote: Other than that, the port seems OK, but I don't have commit rights. Would you like some? We can always use people who are motivated enough to go through TRAC and commit stuff! :-) - Jordan ___

Re: Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-19 Thread Doug McCorkle
> Doug McCorkle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 3:39 PM > -0800 wrote: >>Can this ticket be reviewed? Thanks. >> >> >>[ http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/11232 >>]http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/11232 > > It's committed now. Thanks for con

Re: Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-22 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 19 January 2007 12:47:43 -0800 "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Cédric Luthi wrote: Other than that, the port seems OK, but I don't have commit rights. Would you like some? We can always use people who are motivated enough to go through

Re: Ticket 11232 was (Re: gmtl port file)

2007-01-22 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Let me see what can be done to fix this... On Jan 22, 2007, at 2:12 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: --On 19 January 2007 12:47:43 -0800 "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Cédric Luthi wrote: Other than that, the port seems OK, but I don't have commit righ