Hi David,
you added a pre-release version of gtk3 a few weeks ago. I was looking
into updating it to the final GTK+ 3.0.0. I noticed the new port lives
in category gnome while gtk2 is in x11.
Was this intentional? In my opinion we should move both into the same
category.
Rainer
_
On Feb 18, 2011, at 02:05, Rainer Müller wrote:
> you added a pre-release version of gtk3 a few weeks ago. I was looking
> into updating it to the final GTK+ 3.0.0. I noticed the new port lives
> in category gnome while gtk2 is in x11.
>
> Was this intentional? In my opinion we should move both i
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2011, at 02:05, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> > you added a pre-release version of gtk3 a few weeks ago. I was looking
> > into updating it to the final GTK+ 3.0.0. I noticed the new port lives
> > in category gnome while gtk2 is in x11.
On 2011-02-18 18:32 , David Baumgold wrote:
> I agree that gtk2 and gtk3 should be in the same category, but I figured
> that "gnome" was more applicable than "x11", considering that GTK is the
> Gnome ToolKit. I'm in favor of moving gtk2 to the gnome category: does
> anyone have any objections?
A
I've moved the gtk2, gtk2-aurora, and gtk2-murrine ports from the x11
category to the gnome category, since they were marked nomaintainer. I also
accidentally moved the gtk2-extra port, even though I'm not the maintainer
-- sorry! Several other gtk and gtk2 ports need to be moved, as well, if we
wa
