On Saturday May 30 2015 05:53:08 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Even introducing a stub portgroup would be preferable to repeating this code
> everywhere.
++
> I don't like the name "stub port" because it is confusingly similar to
> "subport" which is a different concept. But not all stub ports are met
On May 28, 2015, at 11:30 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday May 28 2015 12:27:19 Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> Install some dummy files instead of failing. Something like this:
>>
>>PortSystem 1.0
>>name foo
>>supported_archs noarch
>>archive_sites
>>distfiles
>>
On Thursday May 28 2015 12:27:19 Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> Install some dummy files instead of failing. Something like this:
>
> PortSystem 1.0
> name foo
> supported_archs noarch
> archive_sites
> distfiles
> use_configure no
> build {}
> destroot {
> sy
On May 28, 2015, at 11:48 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> What was the magic formula again to use in a meta-package port that only
> exists to pull in (depend on) a number of other ports? Just supported_archs
> noarch together with an error message in the pre-fetch?
Install some dummy files inst
Hi,
What was the magic formula again to use in a meta-package port that only exists
to pull in (depend on) a number of other ports? Just supported_archs noarch
together with an error message in the pre-fetch?
Thanks,
R.
___
macports-dev mailing list
m
