On May 7, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>> On May 7, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>>
>>> Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>>
Looks like a missing dependency or a non-existent port.
>>>
>>> that was my theory too at first
>>>
>
Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>
>> Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Looks like a missing dependency or a non-existent port.
>>
>> that was my theory too at first
>>
>>> Maybe there is something here:
>>> http://theory.github.com/mytap/
>>
On May 7, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>> On May 7, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>>
>>> this seems to be a good basis, however, I get a build error :
>>> ld: library not found for -lmytap
>>
>> I did the same thing a few weeks ago with
Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On May 7, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>
>> this seems to be a good basis, however, I get a build error :
>> ld: library not found for -lmytap
>
> I did the same thing a few weeks ago with similar results.
I'll put my work into the bitbucket
>
> Looks
On May 7, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> I noticed that mariadb presently is at @5.2.9
> according to http://downloads.mariadb.org/mariadb/ there are 4 stable
> releases in 4 brances : @5.1.62 , @5.2.12 , @5.3.7 , @5.5.23
> thus the port hasn't been kept up-to-date since 2011-12-05
I noticed that mariadb presently is at @5.2.9
according to http://downloads.mariadb.org/mariadb/ there are 4 stable
releases in 4 brances : @5.1.62 , @5.2.12 , @5.3.7 , @5.5.23
thus the port hasn't been kept up-to-date since 2011-12-05
now, what's the policy as to mariadb ?
do we keep older stable
