Re: [117881] trunk/dports/science/netcdf

2014-03-16 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 16, 2014, at 00:02, take...@macports.org wrote: > Revision > 117881 > Author > take...@macports.org > Date > 2014-03-15 22:02:06 -0700 (Sat, 15 Mar 2014) > Log Message > > netcdf: updated for 4.3.1.1. Obtain distfiles from github using PortGro

Re: revision bump for netcdf and netcdf-*

2014-01-29 Thread Sean Farley
peter.dane...@bo.ingv.it writes: > Hi all and Sean, > > I have the impression the netcdf and netcdf-* would requires a revision bump. > This is due to the MPI changes and probably affects only installations with > the `+openmpi` variant. However, if these were active the

revision bump for netcdf and netcdf-*

2014-01-29 Thread Peter Danecek
Hi all and Sean, I have the impression the netcdf and netcdf-* would requires a revision bump. This is due to the MPI changes and probably affects only installations with the `+openmpi` variant. However, if these were active the upgrade is not clean. With some manual wiggling this is solved

Re: [108224] trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile

2013-07-16 Thread Ryan Schmidt
e, 16 Jul 2013) >> Log Message: >> --- >> netcdf: force using +openmpi when hdf5-18 +openmpi is installed, closing >> #39529 >> >> Modified Paths: >> -- >> trunk/dports

Re: [108224] trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile

2013-07-16 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:48 PM, take...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 108224 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/108224 > Author: take...@macports.org > Date: 2013-07-16 13:48:40 -0700 (Tue, 16 Jul 2013) > Log Message: > --- > netcdf: force using

netcdf-fortran +universal

2013-05-12 Thread David Strubbe
Hi, Can anyone advise on how to make a port using netcdf-fortran +universal, specifically how to resolve the paths where the Fortran mod files get installed? This might involve use of the 'muniversal' portgroup. See the discussion at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/38995 Tha

Re: [92667] trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile

2012-05-03 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 3, 2012, at 08:35, take...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 92667 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/92667 > Author: take...@macports.org > Date: 2012-05-03 06:35:06 -0700 (Thu, 03 May 2012) > Log Message: > --- > netcdf: delete distfiles. See

Re: [91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

2012-04-12 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-4-13 13:40 , Eric Cronin wrote: > On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Joshua Root wrote: >> On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote: >>> Wasn't there a second issue that the filenames for packages don't >>> include epoch, so there is a risk of grabbing/reusing the package from a >>> different epoc

Re: [91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

2012-04-12 Thread Eric Cronin
On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote: >> On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote: >>> On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the revision. epoch: 1 version: 4.2 >

Re: [91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

2012-04-12 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-4-13 04:47 , Eric Cronin wrote: > On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote: >> On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >>> When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the >>> revision. >>> epoch: 1 >>> version: 4.2 >>> revision: 2 >> >> The bug in the registry API that nec

Re: [91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

2012-04-12 Thread Eric Cronin
On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote: On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the revision. epoch: 1 version: 4.2 revision: 2 The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1 BTW. Wasn't there a second iss

Re: [91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

2012-04-12 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1 BTW. Ah, great! We'd still need to do it at least two weeks after 2.1 is released :-) smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev

Re: [91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

2012-04-12 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the revision. > epoch: 1 > version: 4.2 > revision: 2 The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1 BTW. - Josh ___ macports-de

Re: [91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

2012-04-12 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
>> Modified: trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile >> === >> --- trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile 2012-04-12 03:38:31 UTC (rev >> 91864) >> +++ trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfil

Re: [91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

2012-04-11 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 11, 2012, at 22:44, take...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 91865 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/91865 > Author: take...@macports.org > Date: 2012-04-11 20:44:42 -0700 (Wed, 11 Apr 2012) > Log Message: > --- > netcdf-cxx: replaced epoc

Re: [66532] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-devel/Portfile

2010-04-16 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 16, 2010, at 05:06, take...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 66532 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/66532 > Author: take...@macports.org > Date: 2010-04-16 03:06:44 -0700 (Fri, 16 Apr 2010) > Log Message: > --- > netcdf-devel: updated fo

Re: [59162] trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile

2009-10-10 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 10, 2009, at 14:54, adfernan...@macports.org wrote: Modified Paths: -- trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile +configure.env-appendLDFLAGS=-L${prefix}/lib LIBS=-lhdf5 Note that you don't need to manually put LDFLAGS=-L${prefix}/lib into the conf

netcdf

2009-08-09 Thread Takeshi Enomoto
Hi, I decided to take over the maintenance of netcdf. I made netcdf built without --enable-netcdf-4 by removing netcdf4 and dap from default variants. This removes new features but made much more compatible with many existing packages. For a few exceptions such as nco, cdo and wgrib2, one can

Re: [53669] trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile

2009-07-11 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 11, 2009, at 09:57, take...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 53669 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/53669 Author: take...@macports.org Date: 2009-07-11 07:57:43 -0700 (Sat, 11 Jul 2009) Log Message: --- netcdf: fixed +universal In the future, could you please

Re: [52441] trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile

2009-06-16 Thread Frank Schima
On Jun 16, 2009, at 3:24 PM, p...@macports.org wrote: Revision 52441 Author p...@macports.org Date 2009-06-16 14:24:00 -0700 (Tue, 16 Jun 2009) Log Message updated to 4.0.1 Modified Paths trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile Diff Modified: trunk/dports/science/netcdf/Portfile (52440