Re: no no_ / was Re: [MacPorts] #28985: glib2 does not need dbus

2011-03-31 Thread Joshua Root
On 2011-4-1 07:37 , Titus von Boxberg wrote: > Am 31.03.2011 um 17:10 schrieb MacPorts: > >> We'd also rather not use variants named >> like +no_foo, instead, have a default +foo variant that can be turned off. > Really? > I copied the no_xx scheme from another port (here: graphviz, but I think th

no no_ / was Re: [MacPorts] #28985: glib2 does not need dbus

2011-03-31 Thread Titus von Boxberg
Am 31.03.2011 um 17:10 schrieb MacPorts: > We'd also rather not use variants named > like +no_foo, instead, have a default +foo variant that can be turned off. Really? I copied the no_xx scheme from another port (here: graphviz, but I think there are quite a few ports with no_x11.) If that is depr