Re: php category

2007-10-30 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 25, 2007, at 05:34, Anders F Björklund wrote: Ryan Schmidt wrote: port lint should probably just check the primary category... (at least that's the only ones that are in the list it knows) Maybe port lint should just check that the first category listed matches the directory the p

Re: php category

2007-10-25 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ryan Schmidt wrote: port lint should probably just check the primary category... (at least that's the only ones that are in the list it knows) Maybe port lint should just check that the first category listed matches the directory the portfile is actually in? So, for example, it would warn ab

Re: php category

2007-10-25 Thread Randall Wood
On 25 Oct 2007, at 06:21, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 25, 2007, at 05:15, Anders F Björklund wrote: Randall Wood wrote: The only requirement with regard to categories that I am aware of is that a port be in a category in the dports tree so that PortIndex can find it. While it makes sense

Re: php category

2007-10-25 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 25, 2007, at 05:15, Anders F Björklund wrote: Randall Wood wrote: The only requirement with regard to categories that I am aware of is that a port be in a category in the dports tree so that PortIndex can find it. While it makes sense that portlint should issue warnings about categ

Re: php category

2007-10-25 Thread Anders F Björklund
Randall Wood wrote: The only requirement with regard to categories that I am aware of is that a port be in a category in the dports tree so that PortIndex can find it. While it makes sense that portlint should issue warnings about categories that don't exist (was the category a typo?), portlin

Re: php category

2007-10-25 Thread Randall Wood
On 24 Oct 2007, at 03:30, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I presume we should remove "php" from the categories of each of these ports? I don't see why we would need a "php" category. The php software itself is a language that's often used for web sites, so "lang&

Re: php category

2007-10-24 Thread Jyrki Wahlstedt
On 24.10.2007, at 10.30, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I presume we should remove "php" from the categories of each of these ports? I don't see why we would need a "php" category. The php software itself is a language that's often used for web sites, so "lang&

php category

2007-10-24 Thread Ryan Schmidt
remove "php" from the categories of each of these ports? I don't see why we would need a "php" category. The php software itself is a language that's often used for web sites, so "lang" and "www" are good categories. And webapps developed with