Re: Please start commit message with port name.

2014-11-08 Thread Rainer Müller
On 11/08/2014 04:26 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On Nov 8, 2014, at 2:01 AM, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > >> The rule of thumb is to start the commit line with the component, e.g. >> "port gdal" for gdal and "base" for change in base. Also "maintainer >> timeout" should be specified, I put the main

Re: Please start commit message with port name.

2014-11-08 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Nov 8, 2014, at 2:01 AM, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > The rule of thumb is to start the commit line with the component, e.g. > "port gdal" for gdal and "base" for change in base. Also "maintainer > timeout" should be specified, I put the maintenance info at the end of > the message. > > We could e

Re: Please start commit message with port name.

2014-11-07 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, petr <9...@ingv.it> wrote: > I'd like to propose to start commit messages with the port name. This helps > very much to read them for example in the Timeline. It's already the case, I remember being pointed at this several years ago. The rul

Re: Please start commit message with port name.

2014-11-04 Thread Sean Farley
Vincent Habchi writes: > Ciao Petr, > >> I'd like to propose to start commit messages with the port name. This helps >> very much to read them for example in the Timeline. >> >> For example: >> >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/127794

Re: Please start commit message with port name.

2014-11-04 Thread Vincent Habchi
Ciao Petr, > I'd like to propose to start commit messages with the port name. This helps > very much to read them for example in the Timeline. > > For example: > > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/127794 -- Correct various bugs. Bump to > revision 1. > https:

Please start commit message with port name.

2014-11-04 Thread petr
Hi Vincent, I'd like to propose to start commit messages with the port name. This helps very much to read them for example in the Timeline. For example: https://trac.macports.org/changeset/127794 -- Correct various bugs. Bump to revision 1. https://trac.macports.org/changeset/127795 --

Re: port ${name}

2014-10-18 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Oct 18, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Mark Brethen wrote: > At this point I issued 'sudo port clean reduce-csl' and everything was ok, > but should portfiles anticipate such an event? We generally consider interrupted builds to be user error. If we eventually decide that we should clean up preemptivel

Re: port ${name}

2014-10-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 18, 2014, at 9:59 PM, Mark Brethen wrote: > On Oct 18, 2014, at 9:50 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Oct 18, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Mark Brethen wrote: >> >>> However an issue I've found is that if the install process is interrupted, >>> a subsequent re-issue of 'port install reduce' will fai

Re: port ${name}

2014-10-18 Thread Mark Brethen
On Oct 18, 2014, at 9:50 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Mark Brethen wrote: > >> if {${name} eq ${subport}} { >> supported_archs noarch >> distfiles >> archive_sites >> >> use_configure no >> >> build {} >> >> depends_build-append\ >>

Re: port ${name}

2014-10-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 18, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Mark Brethen wrote: > if {${name} eq ${subport}} { >supported_archs noarch >distfiles >archive_sites > >use_configure no > >build {} > >depends_build-append\ >port:reduce-common\ >port:reduce-csl\ >port:re

Re: port ${name}

2014-10-18 Thread Mark Brethen
On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > All ports must install at least one file. You can look at other metaports to > see what they do. Typically they create a file called README and put either a > placeholder message or the port's description into it. > > You'll also want to set

Re: port ${name}

2014-10-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 13, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Mark Brethen wrote: > > On Oct 13, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Mark Brethen wrote: >>> If a user tries to install port ${name} how should this be handled? >> >> That depends

Re: port ${name}

2014-10-13 Thread Mark Brethen
On Oct 13, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Mark Brethen wrote: > If a user tries to install port ${name} how should this be handled? > > That depends on what exactly you're trying to do. Obvious possibilities > include instal

Re: port ${name}

2014-10-13 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Mark Brethen wrote: > If a user tries to install port ${name} how should this be handled? That depends on what exactly you're trying to do. Obvious possibilities include installing all subports or some common subset thereof, via dependencies possibly

port ${name}

2014-10-13 Thread Mark Brethen
My portfile uses subports to install the various sources in an svn repository. The port name isn't used at all. Are there examples of this? If a user tries to install port ${name} how should this be handled? Mark ___ macports-dev mailing

Re: github PortGroup and (sub)port name setting (#40831)

2013-12-29 Thread Davide Liessi
2013/12/28 Rainer Müller : > On 2013-12-26 19:25, Davide Liessi wrote: >> can you please review this? >> >> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40831 > > I committed the change to the github port group. > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/115223 I reopened the ticket, since the applied change breaks

Re: github PortGroup and (sub)port name setting (#40831)

2013-12-28 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2013-12-26 19:25, Davide Liessi wrote: > Dear MacPorts developers, > can you please review this? > > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40831 I committed the change to the github port group. http://trac.macports.org/changeset/115223 Rainer ___ macport

Re: github PortGroup and (sub)port name setting (#40831)

2013-12-26 Thread Davide Liessi
Dear MacPorts developers, can you please review this? https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40831 Merry Christmas to you all. Davide Liessi ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports

github PortGroup and (sub)port name setting (#40831)

2013-11-26 Thread Davide Liessi
Dear MacPorts developers, can you please review the patch I submitted at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/40831? I would appreciate any comments. Best wishes. Davide Liessi ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.maco

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 26, 2009, at 22:21, Scott Haneda wrote: Thanks for all the info, very interesting. I am glad this came up, as there is a pretty big poop fest over on the twitter dev mailing list about their user_id breaking into 64 bit territory. They return JSON for most of everything, and most d

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Scott Haneda
Thanks for all the info, very interesting. I am glad this came up, as there is a pretty big poop fest over on the twitter dev mailing list about their user_id breaking into 64 bit territory. They return JSON for most of everything, and most devs are using php5, which most hosts are buildin

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Akira Kitada
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Why would anybody want MySQL 5.0.x now that 5.1.x is available? > > We already have a mysql4 port which provides 4.1.x, though I expect to > remove it next year after 4.1.x has been end-of-life'd. > > I am in the process of removing the mysql3

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 26, 2009, at 17:16, Mark Hattam wrote: MySQL continues to refer to both 5.0.x and 5.1.x as both being GA releases http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/5.0.html and http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/5.1.html And there appears to be no end-of-life statement about 5.0 apart from th

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Mark Hattam
On 26 Sep 2009, at 17:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Sep 26, 2009, at 04:53, Akira Kitada wrote: I realized mysql5 and mysql5-server ports are still pointing to 5.0.x, ex-GA release of MySQL and need to install mysql5-devel and mysql5-server-devel for 5.1.x, the current GA release. If I unders

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 26, 2009, at 14:24, Scott Haneda wrote: Question of curiosity. Why does MacPorts needs to be able to build a UB? MacPorts builds on the machine it is intended to use. I am not aware of many desiring to copy a binary from one machine to the other, and that would be a lot of work wit

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Joshua Root
On 2009-9-27 05:24, Scott Haneda wrote: > Question of curiosity. Why does MacPorts needs to be able to build a > UB? MacPorts builds on the machine it is intended to use. I am not > aware of many desiring to copy a binary from one machine to the other, > and that would be a lot of work with all t

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Scott Haneda
Question of curiosity. Why does MacPorts needs to be able to build a UB? MacPorts builds on the machine it is intended to use. I am not aware of many desiring to copy a binary from one machine to the other, and that would be a lot of work with all the man pages and other parts that may co

MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Akira Kitada
Hi, I realized mysql5 and mysql5-server ports are still pointing to 5.0.x, ex-GA release of MySQL and need to install mysql5-devel and mysql5-server-devel for 5.1.x, the current GA release. If I understand correctly, -devel suffix denotes that the port is a development version but this case, it a

Re: MySQL port name confusion

2009-09-26 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 26, 2009, at 04:53, Akira Kitada wrote: I realized mysql5 and mysql5-server ports are still pointing to 5.0.x, ex-GA release of MySQL and need to install mysql5-devel and mysql5-server-devel for 5.1.x, the current GA release. If I understand correctly, -devel suffix denotes that the port

Re: Bug in port name handling

2007-01-03 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Jan 3, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote: I've CC'ed the dev list - anybody have any thoughts on modifying the version-matching regex here? And does anybody know of any other locations where the version is matched against a regex? Final thoughts: I just remembered that this same routi

Re: Bug in port name handling

2007-01-03 Thread Kevin Ballard
It appears, from looking at the source, that the registry only matches the following characters in the version: - _ a-z A-Z 0-9 . Perhaps this should be modified. I would suggest matching everything besides, say, a space here. Everything else should be fine, because the routine