Re: port install v port mpkg | mdmg

2016-08-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 23, 2016, at 7:38 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote: > On Aug 22, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> Craig, until base is fixed to automatically include daemondo in pkgs when >> needed, can't you just add a post-pkg block that copies daemondo from the >> location where it was

Re: port install v port mpkg | mdmg

2016-08-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 12, 2016, at 5:30 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > >> My mythtv-pkg.27 is intended to be used to create an all-in-one >> installer package for MythTV. I have a VM with a custom prefix for >> this. The resulting mpkg needs daemondo, so I created the nasty hack >> in MacPorts_daemondo.

Re: port install v port mpkg | mdmg

2016-08-12 Thread Rainer Müller
Hello, On 2016-08-10 17:23, Craig Treleaven wrote: > Is it possible for a port to take different actions depending on > whether the user has initiated ‘port install’ v. 'port mpkg’ (or > ‘port mdmg’)? Unfortunately, no, as all phases can be run individually. So up to the destroot phase, there is

port install v port mpkg | mdmg

2016-08-10 Thread Craig Treleaven
Hi: Is it possible for a port to take different actions depending on whether the user has initiated ‘port install’ v. 'port mpkg’ (or ‘port mdmg’)? My mythtv-pkg.27 is intended to be used to create an all-in-one installer package for MythTV. I have a VM with a custom prefix for this. The